Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

There is no such thing as 'diversity'!

Hans-Jörg Roth1

  • 1Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Lead Synthesis & Chemogenetics, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland. hansjoerg.roth@novartis.com

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
|June 9, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cooperative Free Energy: Induced Protein-Protein Interactions and Cooperative Solvation in Ternary Complexes.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025
Same author

Lessons for Oral Bioavailability: How Conformationally Flexible Cyclic Peptides Enter and Cross Lipid Membranes.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2023
Same author

Polar/apolar interfaces modulate the conformational behavior of cyclic peptides with impact on their passive membrane permeability.

RSC advances·2022
Same author

Effect of Flexibility, Lipophilicity, and the Location of Polar Residues on the Passive Membrane Permeability of a Series of Cyclic Decapeptides.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2021
Same author

Rationalization of the Membrane Permeability Differences in a Series of Analogue Cyclic Decapeptides.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2018
Same author

Design and Development of a Cyclic Decapeptide Scaffold with Suitable Properties for Bioavailability and Oral Exposure.

ChemMedChem·2016
Same journal

Function through shape: An overview of DNA G-quadruplexes in transcriptional regulation.

Current opinion in chemical biology·2026
Same journal

Advances in tools and technologies for multiplexed bioluminescence imaging.

Current opinion in chemical biology·2026
Same journal

High-resolution molecular mapping by expansion-coupled label-free and multimodal imaging.

Current opinion in chemical biology·2026
Same journal

Recent advances in glycoconjugate-based therapeutics.

Current opinion in chemical biology·2026
Same journal

Towards better red emitters for bioimaging: Innovations in rhodamine and cyanine chemistry.

Current opinion in chemical biology·2026
Same journal

Chemigenetic fluorescent biosensors in biological imaging - New trends and advances.

Current opinion in chemical biology·2026
See all related articles

Chemical diversity is often misunderstood as simple structural dissimilarity. This opinion piece argues that true diversity requires external criteria, like biological assays, to measure relevant differences in chemical structures.

Area of Science:

  • Medicinal Chemistry
  • Chemical Biology
  • Computational Chemistry

Background:

  • The term 'diversity' is crucial in combinatorial chemistry and drug discovery.
  • Current understanding defines diversity as the degree of structural dissimilarity among chemical entities.
  • This definition is increasingly applied in high-throughput screening and library design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the conventional definition of chemical diversity.
  • To propose a more relevant and context-dependent measure of diversity.
  • To highlight the limitations of assessing diversity solely based on structural dissimilarity.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis and argumentation.
  • Literature review on diversity metrics in chemistry.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Philosophical consideration of 'relevant' versus 'superficial' diversity.
  • Main Results:

    • The conventional definition of chemical diversity is deemed superficial and potentially irrelevant.
    • Relevant diversity is contingent upon external criteria, such as biological assays or specific applications.
    • Structural dissimilarity alone does not equate to meaningful or relevant diversity.

    Conclusions:

    • A collection's diversity is not an intrinsic property but is defined by the context and criteria applied.
    • The concept of 'relevant diversity' necessitates an external reference point to discern functional differences.
    • Chemical structures, per se, do not possess inherent relevant diversity; it emerges from their interaction with external systems.