Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mixed model estimation methods for the Rasch model.

Frank Rijmen1, Francis Tuerlinckx, Michel Meulders

  • 1Department of Psychology, K. U. Leuven, HCIV, Tiensestraat, 102, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. frank.rijmen@psy.kuleuven.ac.be

Journal of Applied Measurement
|June 9, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ionizing Radiation Actively Reshapes Bone Marrow-Derived Extracellular Vesicle MicroRNA Cargo with the Involvement of hnRNP A2b1.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Computational protocol for hierarchical Bayesian modeling of perception and generalization in fear conditioning.

STAR protocols·2026
Same author

Asymptotically Correct Person Fit z-Statistics For the Rasch Testlet Model.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

Detecting association changes in intensive longitudinal data in real time: An exponentially weighted moving average procedure.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same author

Testing and improving the robustness of amortized bayesian inference for cognitive models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

From the laboratory to the real-world: Future directions for online social support in diverse settings and populations.

The journal of pain·2025
Same journal

Development of a Short Form of the CPAI-A (Form B) with Rasch Analyses.

Journal of applied measurement·2021
Same journal

Evaluating the Impact of Multidimensionality on Type I and Type II Error Rates using the Q-Index Item Fit Statistic for the Rasch Model.

Journal of applied measurement·2021
Same journal

Diabetes Distress in Emerging Adults: Refining the Problem Areas in Diabetes-Emerging Adult Version using Rasch Analysis.

Journal of applied measurement·2021
Same journal

A Psychometric Replication of Fan (1998) Item Response Theory and Classical Test Theory: An Empirical Comparison of their Item/Person Statistics.

Journal of applied measurement·2021
Same journal

The Development of the Mental Toughness Situational Judgment Test: A Novel Approach to Assessing Mental Toughness.

Journal of applied measurement·2021
Same journal

Using the Rasch Model to Measure Comprehension of Fraction Addition.

Journal of applied measurement·2021
See all related articles

Mixed models account for dependent observations using random effects. Four estimation methods for the Rasch model showed similar performance, with slight variance parameter issues for PQL2 and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC).

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Item Response Theory

Background:

  • Mixed models are essential for handling dependent observations in statistical analyses by incorporating random effects.
  • Item response models, such as the Rasch model, can be viewed as generalized linear and nonlinear mixed models.
  • Understanding and comparing estimation methods for these models is crucial for accurate analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conceptualize item response models as generalized linear and nonlinear mixed models.
  • To assess the performance of four common estimation methods for the Rasch model.
  • To evaluate how estimation method performance varies under different simulation conditions.

Main Methods:

  • The study introduces the mixed model framework and conceptualizes item response models within this framework.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Four estimation methods were evaluated: Gaussian quadrature, Laplace approximation, Penalized Quasi-Likelihood 2 (PQL2), and Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC).
  • A simulation study varied the number of items, persons, and degree of interindividual differences to test method performance.

    • Main Results:

    • All four estimation methods performed comparably well in estimating parameters for the Rasch model.
    • Penalized Quasi-Likelihood 2 (PQL2) and Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) showed slightly poorer recovery of the variance parameter.
    • Performance was assessed across various conditions, including sample size and heterogeneity.

    Conclusions:

    • The evaluated estimation methods for the Rasch model are generally robust and perform similarly.
    • Researchers should be aware of potential minor inaccuracies in variance parameter estimation with PQL2 and MCMC methods.
    • The findings provide guidance on selecting appropriate estimation techniques for item response models.