Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is temporal artery biopsy a worthwhile procedure?

Elaine W T Chong1, Amanda J Robertson

  • 1Department of General Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. elainechongwt@hotmail.com

ANZ Journal of Surgery
|June 10, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corneal Transplantation in Australia Over 29 Years: A Retrospective Analysis of Medicare Data from 1994 to 2022.

Ophthalmic epidemiology·2024
Same author

'Aye, there's the rub'-Ocular allergy and keratoconus.

Clinical & experimental ophthalmology·2022
Same author

Face Mask-Associated Recurrent Corneal Erosion Syndrome and Corneal Infection.

Eye & contact lens·2021
Same author

Age-related macular degeneration in ethnically diverse Australia: Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study.

Ophthalmic epidemiology·2015
Same author

Management of blunt and penetrating biliary tract trauma.

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery·2012
Same author

Living donor transplantation: is there inequality of access?

ANZ journal of surgery·2011

Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) for giant cell arteritis (GCA) management is effective in only 23.6% of cases. Despite low impact on treatment decisions, TAB remains crucial for diagnosing GCA when clinical suspicion is high.

Area of Science:

  • Rheumatology
  • Vascular Medicine
  • Diagnostic Procedures

Background:

  • Giant cell arteritis (GCA) diagnosis relies on temporal artery biopsy (TAB), despite its limitations in sensitivity and specificity.
  • Current practice often involves empirical steroid treatment before and after TAB, even with negative results if clinical suspicion is high.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of temporal artery biopsy (TAB) results on the clinical management of patients suspected of having giant cell arteritis (GCA).

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 70 consecutive patients who underwent TAB between 1999 and 2003 at the Royal Melbourne Hospital.
  • Case notes were reviewed to assess changes in patient management following TAB results.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Histological examination showed 7% positive biopsies, 7% 'healed arteritis', and 86% negative biopsies.
  • TAB results influenced management in 23.6% of patients; steroids were discontinued in seven with negative biopsies and continued in six with positive or healed arteritis.
  • Management remained unchanged in 76.4% of patients, with some continuing steroids despite negative biopsies or discontinuing them due to lack of symptomatic improvement.

Conclusions:

  • Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) significantly altered management in a minority of patients (23.6%).
  • Despite the low impact on treatment decisions for many, TAB is considered a valuable diagnostic tool for GCA, especially when clinical suspicion is present.
  • The procedure is deemed important for managing GCA to prevent serious complications, justifying its use despite potential for unnecessary surgery in some cases.