Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope.

W Prinzmetal1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley 94720.

Perception & Psychophysics
|May 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Illusory conjunctions are alive and well: a reply to Donk (1999).

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
Same author

The Ponzo illusion and the perception of orientation.

Perception & psychophysics·2001
Same author

The tilt-constancy theory of visual illusions.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
Same author

Mapping symbols to response modalities: interference effects on Stroop-like tasks.

Perception & psychophysics·1998
Same author

Dividing attention between the color and the shape of objects.

Perception & psychophysics·1998
Same author

The phenomenology of attention. 2. Brightness and contrast.

Consciousness and cognition·1997
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

The word-superiority effect (WSE) is more general than previously thought. This study demonstrates WSE occurs even without brief exposures, suggesting broader applicability in cognitive psychology.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Reading Processes

Background:

  • The word-superiority effect (WSE) is a well-documented phenomenon in cognitive psychology.
  • Traditionally, WSE has been demonstrated using brief stimulus exposures and poststimulus masks.
  • The necessity of these specific conditions for observing WSE has been questioned.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the word-superiority effect (WSE) can be obtained without employing brief stimulus exposures or poststimulus masks.
  • To determine the generalizability of the WSE beyond traditional experimental parameters.
  • To explore the robustness of word recognition advantages under varied perceptual conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Six experiments were conducted, presenting subjects with stimulus strings and two alternative strings differing by one letter.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli were varied in presentation clarity (small type) and masking conditions (pattern mask, spatial frequency mask).
  • Response accuracy was measured without time pressure, focusing on word vs. nonword discrimination.

    • Main Results:

    • Subjects demonstrated significantly higher accuracy in identifying words compared to nonwords, letters among digits, or letters among number signs.
    • The WSE was observed even when stimuli were presented in small type, embedded in pattern masks, or spatial frequency masks.
    • Performance with words consistently surpassed performance with single letters presented alone.

    Conclusions:

    • The word-superiority effect is a more general phenomenon than previously assumed.
    • WSE is not exclusively dependent on tachistoscopic exposure or specific masking techniques.
    • The findings suggest that word advantages in recognition are robust across a wider range of perceptual conditions.