Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sequential task predictability in task switching.

Iring Koch1

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Munich, Germany. iring.koch@cbs.mpg.de

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|June 11, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contrasting cognitive control in the Simon and spatial Stroop tasks regarding their interference with the control of standing balance.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Exploring age-related inhibitory deficits in auditory attention: Evidence from attention switching.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Visual-manual response selection produces dual-task interference in auditory-verbal memory encoding.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Opposite effects of interruption frequency on performance in interrupted and uninterrupted multistep task.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Huh, what did they say again? The influence of task interruption position and workload on auditory-verbal memory performance.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Dissociating Task Selection and Response Selection in Dual-Task Contexts: Evidence from a Novel Trial-by-Trial Analysis of Temporal Overlap between Tasks.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Predictable task sequences, not just preparation time, can reduce task switching costs. This benefit applies to both switching and repeating tasks, suggesting control processes are task-specific, not switch-specific.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Task switching research often focuses on preparation time to reduce switch costs.
  • Sequential task predictability offers an alternative manipulation for task preparation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of sequential task predictability on task preparation.
  • To determine if predictability benefits are specific to task switching.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments 1 and 2: Participants performed predictable (AABB) then random task sequences.
  • Experiment 3: Participants switched from random to predictable task sequences.
  • Analyzed the impact of predictability on task control processes.

Main Results:

  • The benefit of predictability-based task preparation was observed in both predictable and random sequences.

Related Experiment Videos

  • This predictability benefit was not specific to task switching events.
  • Task control processes appear necessary for both task repetitions and switches.

    • Conclusions:

    • Task switching may not solely rely on switch-specific reconfiguration.
    • Task-specific control processes are likely engaged regardless of whether a task is repeated or switched.
    • Predictability influences cognitive control in a manner that extends beyond switch-specific mechanisms.