Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Finite Element Modelling of a Cellular Electric Microenvironment
Published on: May 18, 2021
Calculation of electric-field gradients based on higher-order generalized Douglas-Kroll transformations
Frank Neese1, Alexander Wolf, Timo Fleig
1Max-Planck Institut für Bioanorganische Chemie, Stifstrasse 34-36, D-45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany. neese@mpi-muelheim.mpg.de
Abstract:
In this paper, the calculation of electric-field-like properties based on higher-order Douglas-Kroll-Hess (DKH) transformations is discussed. The electric-field gradient calculated within the Hartree-Fock self-consistent field framework is used as a representative property. The properties are expressed as an analytic first derivative of the four-component Dirac energy and the nth-order DKH energy, respectively. The differences between a "forward" transformation of the relativistic energy or the "back transformation" of the wave function is discussed in some detail. Detailed test calculations were carried out on the electric-field gradient at the halogen nucleus in the series HX (X=F,Cl,Br,I,At) for which extensive reference data are available. The DKH method is shown to reproduce (spin-free) four-component Dirac-Fock results to an accuracy of better than 99% which is significantly closer than previous DKH studies. The calculations of both the Hamiltonian and the property operator are shown to be essentially converged after the second-order transformation, even for elements as heavy as At. In addition, we have obtained results within the density-functional framework using the DKHZ and zeroth-order regular approximation (ZORA) methods. The latter results included picture-change effects at the scalar relativistic variant of the ZORA-4 level and were shown to be in quantitative agreement with earlier results obtained by van Lenthe and Baerends. The picture-change effects are somewhat smaller for the ZORA method compared to DKH. For heavier elements significant differences in the field gradients predicted by the two methods were found. Based on comparison with four-component Dirac-Kohn-Sham calculations, the DKH results are more accurate. Compared to the spin-free Dirac-Kohn-Sham reference values, the ZORA-4 formalism did not improve the results of the ZORA calculations.
Related Concept Videos
Poisson's And Laplace's Equation
Differential Form of Maxwell's Equations
Determining Electric Field From Electric Potential
In general, regardless of whether the electric field is uniform, it points in the direction of decreasing potential because the force on a positive...
Divergence and Curl of Electric Field
Electrostatic Boundary Conditions
The surface integral of an electric field is given by Gauss's law in integral form and is related to...
Divergence and Curl of Magnetic Field
