Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

06:25
A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents
Published on: May 16, 2025
1.3K
Knowledge of resources and competitors in human foraging
Robert L Goldstone1, Benjamin C Ashpole, Michael E Roberts
1Psychology Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. rgoldsto@indiana.edu
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|June 14, 2005
Summary
Human participants in a virtual world showed that seeing others, not resources, led to underutilization of richer pools. Crowds deter resource use, influencing foraging decisions.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Economics
- Social Psychology
- Computational Social Science
Background:
- Human foraging behavior is influenced by resource availability and social factors.
- Previous research (Goldstone & Ashpole, 2004) explored agent and resource visibility in foraging.
- Understanding resource allocation dynamics is crucial for predicting group behavior.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how visibility of other agents and resources affects human resource allocation decisions.
- To analyze population dynamics and foraging patterns in a controlled virtual environment.
- To determine the influence of social presence and resource information on utilization rates.
Main Methods:
- Observing human participants' real-time interactions and resource allocation in a virtual world.
- Manipulating the visibility of participants to each other and the visibility of spatially separated resources.
- Distributing resources with varying relative reinforcement rates (50-50, 65-35, 80-20).
- Utilizing Fourier analyses to detect oscillations in harvesting rates.
Main Results:
- When participants could see each other but not resources, the richer pool was underutilized.
- When participants could see resources but not each other, the richer pool was overutilized.
- Crowd presence acted as a deterrent, not an attractant, to resource utilization.
- Fourier analyses revealed slow (resource invisible) and fast (resource visible, participants invisible) oscillations in harvesting rates.
Conclusions:
- Foraging decisions are jointly influenced by information about oneself (as a forager) and the environment (resources).
- Social visibility plays a critical role in resource allocation, with perceived crowding deterring use.
- Dynamic oscillations in resource harvesting reflect underlying crowd migration patterns influenced by visibility conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
13.5K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
13.5K
Ecological Niches
26.0K
All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.
26.0K
Competition
24.2K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
24.2K
Evolutionary Psychology
914
Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the...
914
Predator-Prey Interactions
21.0K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
21.0K
Habitat Fragmentation
20.9K
Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
20.9K

