Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Processes and impediments in moving patients from the emergency department: pilot study
Edward Oakley1, George Braitberg
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Australia. ed.oakley@rch.org.au
Objective:
To assess the impact of an ED-designed interim orders sheet on patient flow through the ED, and the safety of ED-directed admission.
Methods:
The flow of patients through the ED and inpatient length of stay (IPLOS) was retrospectively reviewed on 135 patients who were admitted using interim orders and 125 patients who were admitted after inpatient unit review in the ED.
Results:
The median time to admission to the ward in the non-interim orders group was 5.7 h (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.8-8.5), with a range from 1.2 to 15.9 h, and in the interim orders group was 6.3 h (IQR: 4.8-8.0) with a range from 0.5 to 22 h (P=0.27). The median IPLOS was 4 days (IQR: 2.0-7.0) in the interim orders group, and 4 days (IQR: 2.1-9.0) in the non-interim orders group (P=0.19).
Conclusion:
There was no difference in the time to patient admission, or IPLOS, with the different processes. Almost half of the average ED stay of adults and about one-third of that of paediatric admissions occurred after the decision to admit was made. Transfer of patients to the ward without inpatient review is appropriate and effective.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

