Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Electrostatic control of aromatic stacking interactions.

Scott L Cockroft1, Christopher A Hunter, Kevin R Lawson

  • 1Centre for Chemical Biology, Department of Chemistry, Krebs Institute for Biomolecular Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7HF, U.K.

Journal of the American Chemical Society
|June 16, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sequence-Dependent Folding of Recognition-Encoded Melamine Oligomers.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Getting on your last nerve: IFNs and resistance to infection.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·2026
Same author

A parasite partner for regulatory affairs.

Science immunology·2026
Same author

Spatial atlas of diabetic kidney disease reveals a B cell-rich subgroup.

Nature·2026
Same author

The role of integrins in T cell-mediated resistance to <i>Cryptosporidium parvum</i>.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Negative cooperativity in the formation of two H-bonds with an oxygen H-bond acceptor.

Chemical science·2026
Same journal

Decoding Galectin-Glycan Recognition with <sup>19</sup>F-Tagged Lectins: from Simple Glycans to the Cellular Glycocalyx.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same journal

Open- and Closed-Shell Roles of Sensitizer and Annihilator in Pseudo-Single Component Mixtures for Upconversion.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same journal

Pressure-Induced Superconductivity at 15 K in van-der-Waals Ferroelectric CuInP<sub>2</sub>S<sub>6</sub>.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same journal

Carbene Analogues of Group 15: Reduction of s-Hydrindacene-Based Chloropnictogenium Ions To Access an Antimony Hydride Monocation and a Trinuclear Bismuth Dication.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same journal

Chiral-Ligand-Modulated Nickel-Catalyzed Stereoselective Radical Migratory C2-Arylation of Carbohydrates.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same journal

Coordination-Constraint-Driven Enhanced Chirality Induction in Perovskite Quantum Dot Solids.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
See all related articles

Investigating aromatic stacking interactions using a supramolecular approach revealed that electrostatic effects are key drivers of interaction energy. Substituents significantly influence these face-to-face stacking forces between aromatic rings.

Area of Science:

  • Supramolecular Chemistry
  • Physical Organic Chemistry

Background:

  • Aromatic stacking interactions are fundamental in molecular recognition and materials science.
  • Understanding the energetic contributions to these interactions is crucial for designing novel molecular systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the free energies of intermolecular aromatic stacking interactions.
  • To elucidate the impact of substituents on stacking interactions between phenyl and pentafluorophenyl rings.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a supramolecular approach for investigating free energies.
  • Utilized chemical double mutant cycles to systematically vary substituents.
  • Focused on face-to-face stacking interactions involving phenyl and pentafluorophenyl moieties.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identified trends in interaction energies influenced by a range of substituents.
  • Demonstrated that electrostatic effects are the dominant factor governing interaction energy.
  • Quantified the influence of electronic modifications on aromatic stacking.

Conclusions:

  • Electrostatic forces play a primary role in modulating aromatic stacking interactions.
  • The findings provide valuable insights for the rational design of molecules with specific stacking properties.
  • Supramolecular methods offer a robust platform for dissecting non-covalent interactions.