Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Skull base approaches in the pediatric population.

Ziv Gil1, Shlomo Constantini, Sergey Spektor

  • 1Skull Base Surgery Unit and the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St., Tel-Aviv 64239, Israel. ziv@dot.co.il

Head & Neck
|June 16, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Irreversible Electroporation for the Treatment of Pediatric Adenotonsillar Hypertrophy.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Nomograms Predictive of Recurrence in Malignant Tumors Treated With Skull Base Surgery: An International Collaborative Study.

Head & neck·2026
Same author

Emotional Burden of Olfactory Dysfunction: A Psychological Cluster Analysis from a Tertiary Smell and Taste Clinic.

International forum of allergy & rhinology·2026
Same author

[Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery in the Pediatric Population: A Tertiary Center Experience in the Last Decade].

Harefuah·2026
Same author

Inflammatory Signatures Beyond Th1/Th2 Endotypes Provide Insights Into Postoperative Recurrence in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

International forum of allergy & rhinology·2026
Same author

Optimizing Parathyroid Localization in Real Life: The Role of Expert-Performed Ultrasonography.

Clinical endocrinology·2026

Pediatric skull base tumor surgery using conventional techniques is safe and feasible, with low complication and mortality rates. Long-term cosmetic outcomes are excellent, showing negligible impact on craniofacial development.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Neurosurgery
  • Pediatric Oncology
  • Craniofacial Surgery

Background:

  • Skull base tumors present unique challenges in pediatric patients.
  • Surgical, oncologic, and developmental outcomes require careful evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the surgical, oncologic, and developmental results of pediatric skull base tumor extirpation.
  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of conventional surgical techniques in this population.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 67 pediatric patients (0.5-18 years) undergoing skull base tumor surgery over 6 years.
  • Tumor classification (benign/malignant), location (anterior, lateral, posterior), and surgical approaches (subcranial, transfacial, subfrontal, combined) were recorded.
  • Adjuvant therapy and postoperative follow-up (3-60 months) were documented.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No severe postoperative complications or perioperative mortality were observed.
  • 80% of patients were alive and well at 2.5 years post-surgery.
  • The subcranial approach demonstrated no adverse cosmetic impact on craniofacial development.

Conclusions:

  • Extirpation of skull base tumors in children using conventional surgical methods is feasible and safe.
  • Pediatric patients exhibit lower complication and mortality rates compared to adults.
  • The subcranial approach yields negligible long-term cosmetic effects.