Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Independent student study groups.

Graham D Hendry1, Sarah J Hyde, Peter Davy

  • 1Office of Teaching and Learning in Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. grahamh@gmp.usyd.edu.au

Medical Education
|June 18, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Hospital Skills Program: a professional development program for non-specialist doctors in New South Wales.

The Medical journal of Australia·2012
Same author

Perceptions of preparation for further training: how our medical schools prepare graduates and the perceived factors influencing access to training.

The Medical journal of Australia·2010
Same author

Readiness for self-directed learning: validation of a new scale with medical students.

Medical teacher·2009
Same author

Problem-based learning tutors' conceptions of their development as tutors.

Medical teacher·2009
Same author

Interprofessional learning for pre-qualification health care students: an outcomes-based evaluation.

Journal of interprofessional care·2008
Same author

Conceptions of problem-based learning: the perspectives of students entering a problem-based medical program.

Medical teacher·2006
Same journal

Channelling Socrates to re-imagine asynchronous online learning.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Moving beyond tokenism: A structured and intentional approach to embedding health advocacy in medical education.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

When I say … 'in situ simulation'.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Examiner training and calibration for simulated clinical examinations: A scoping review.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

When systems set the limits of supervision.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

From psychometrics to partnerships: Broadening what counts as validity evidence.

Medical education·2026
See all related articles

Students in a medical program who participated in study groups for longer durations showed improved academic performance. Effective study groups foster self-regulation and mutual support, benefiting student achievement.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Higher Education Pedagogy
  • Student Learning Strategies

Background:

  • Student-centered learning environments require active student engagement.
  • Self- and co-regulation are key components of effective learning in higher education.
  • Independently formed study groups are a common student-led learning strategy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of self- and co-regulation in student-led study groups.
  • To explore the perceived benefits of study groups for medical students.
  • To determine the impact of study group membership on academic achievement.

Main Methods:

  • Survey of 233 second-year medical students regarding study group participation and features.
  • Analysis of study group duration and membership.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of academic achievement (written summative assessment) between students with and without study group experience.

    • Main Results:

    • A positive correlation was found between the duration of study group cohesion and student performance in written assessments.
    • No significant difference in assessment scores was observed between students who were part of a study group and those who were not.
    • The length of time a study group remained active positively influenced academic outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective study groups are characterized by social cohesion, trust, and mutual regulation of learning.
    • Teachers can foster effective study groups by structuring learning activities, providing clear guidelines, and minimizing competition.
    • Supportive study group dynamics enhance individual motivation and learning outcomes.