Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Individual differences in causal learning and decision making.

Magda Osman1, David R Shanks

  • 1University College London, Department of Psychology, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, England, UK. m.osman@ucl.ac.uk

Acta Psychologica
|June 29, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nothing to see here: The weak evidence base for unconscious control of human behavior.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Replicating the unconscious working memory effect: a multisite Registered Report.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026
Same author

Factors influencing multidisciplinary clinical decision-making in the critical care unit: a systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis.

BJA open·2025
Same author

Good Learners Are Poor Monitors: A Negative Relation Between Learning Ability and Monitoring Accuracy.

Psychological science·2025
Same author

Studying unconscious processing: Contention and consensus.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same journal

Understanding Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in university students: Exploring the roles of neurotic perfectionism, parental perception, and stressful life events.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Tailoring instruction to personality: The mediating role of cognitive tendencies in the effect of extraversion on higher vocational college students' self-regulated learning.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Physical activity and loneliness in rural left-behind children: The mediating roles of social anxiety and self-concept.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Is the juice worth the squeeze? Implications of employee perfectionism and excellencism for in-role and extra-role performance.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Teachers' readiness for sustainable inclusive practices for supporting deaf learners: A cross-sectional study of psychological and contextual dimensions in northern Saudi Arabia.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Health-related quality of life and associated factors among autistic adolescents and young adults, and their peers with mental disorders, and without autism or mental disorders in Chile.

Acta psychologica·2026
See all related articles

People often ignore base-rate information in probability judgments and causal learning. This study shows individuals consistently weight base-rate information similarly across both causal and decision-making tasks, suggesting shared cognitive processes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • The base-rate fallacy describes neglecting overall frequencies in probability estimation.
  • Causal learning also shows a misperception of base-rate information, known as the cause density effect.
  • Existing research highlights potential disconnects in base-rate utilization across tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between causal learning and decision-making.
  • To determine if base-rate information is weighted consistently across causal strength estimation and probability judgments.
  • To explore shared component processes between causal learning and decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Participants engaged in tasks requiring estimation of causal strength.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants also completed judgment and decision-making tasks.
  • Individual differences in base-rate weighting were analyzed across these tasks.

    • Main Results:

    • Individuals exhibit variability in how they weight base-rate information.
    • This weighting strategy is consistent whether estimating causal strength or making probability judgments.
    • Evidence suggests shared cognitive mechanisms underlie both causal learning and decision-making.

    Conclusions:

    • A tendency to differentially weight base-rate information is a generalized cognitive characteristic.
    • This weighting behavior is consistent across distinct tasks like causal inference and decision-making.
    • Causal learning and decision-making likely share underlying component processes.