Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differences in visuomotor control between the upper and lower visual fields.

Michael A Khan1, Gavin P Lawrence

  • 1School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, George Building, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales, LL57 2PX, UK. m.khan@bangor.ac.uk

Experimental Brain Research
|July 2, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"It's not Fair!": Multisensory reaction time differences between D/deaf and hearing populations in athletics starting systems.

Psychology of sport and exercise·2025
Same author

Influence of motor imagery training on hip abductor muscle strength and bilateral transfer effect.

Frontiers in physiology·2023
Same author

The influence of foreperiod duration on the preparation and control of sequential aiming movements.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2023
Same author

Testing anxiety's effect on movement planning and correction: Online upper-limb corrections are not completely automatic.

Human movement science·2022
Same author

Sequential aiming in pairs: the multiple levels of joint action.

Experimental brain research·2021
Same author

Does high state anxiety exacerbate distractor interference?

Human movement science·2021
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Energy-dependent cortical injury thresholds in high-frequency transcortical electrical stimulation: a biophysical study in a rat model.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

Movement control is more precise in the lower visual field, especially during later movement stages. This suggests enhanced visual feedback utilization for improved limb trajectory consistency.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Human Vision

Background:

  • Previous research indicated target size impacts movement time differently across visual fields.
  • The lower visual field may offer more effective visual feedback processing for movement control.
  • Prior studies noted no accuracy differences in the lower visual field for small targets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if superior motor performance exists in the lower visual field under constrained movement times.
  • To explore the role of visual feedback utilization in movement execution across visual fields.
  • To analyze kinematic markers for differences in movement consistency between upper and lower visual fields.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed reaching movements with constrained movement times.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Kinematic data, including peak acceleration, velocity, and negative acceleration, were analyzed.
  • Variability in limb trajectories and correlations between movement distances were assessed.

    • Main Results:

    • Limb trajectories showed greater consistency in the lower visual field during late movement stages.
    • Squared correlation coefficients between distances at peak velocity and end-of-movement were lower in the lower visual field.
    • These kinematic differences suggest enhanced visual feedback processing in the lower visual field.

    Conclusions:

    • Superior motor performance in the lower visual field is linked to better visual feedback utilization.
    • Movement consistency and trajectory control are improved in the lower visual field.
    • Findings support the hypothesis of enhanced visual feedback processing in the lower visual field for motor tasks.