Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using Lotus software to calculate faculty merit increases.

M G Anema1, C Anema

  • 1School of Nursing, Tennessee State University, Nashville 37209-1561.

Computers in Nursing
|May 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The nursing process: what do students know?

The ABNF journal : official journal of the Association of Black Nursing Faculty in Higher Education, Inc·2002
Same author

A computer spreadsheet approach to calculating course grades.

CIN plus·2000
Same author

Rural health content in nursing education.

Nurse educator·2000
Same author

The relationship of academic variables as predictors of success on the National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses (NCLEX-RN) in a selected associate degree program.

The ABNF journal : official journal of the Association of Black Nursing Faculty in Higher Education, Inc·2000
Same author

Strategies for taking lecture notes.

Imprint·1997
Same author

Developing a complete evaluation instrument package.

Nurse educator·1997
Same journal

Medi-Sim Multimedia: AACN Critical Care-Hematological System.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

Managing Information in Healthcare: Concepts and Cases.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

Using online learning in a traditional face-to-face environment.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

The "big bang" implementation: not for the faint of heart.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

Homebound older adults' experiences with the Internet and e-mail.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

A study of factors related to the use of online resources by nurse educators.

Computers in nursing·2002
See all related articles

Annual faculty performance evaluations are complex and time-consuming. This study details a computer spreadsheet system using Lotus software to objectively calculate faculty merit increases, improving precision and efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Higher Education Administration
  • Educational Technology
  • Human Resource Management

Background:

  • Faculty performance evaluations are typically conducted annually in colleges and universities.
  • Current evaluation processes are often time-consuming and lack objectivity, failing to provide a comprehensive assessment.
  • Faculty merit increases are directly tied to these performance evaluations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the inefficiencies and lack of objectivity in traditional faculty evaluation processes.
  • To propose and describe a computer-based system for calculating faculty merit increases.
  • To enhance the precision and comprehensiveness of faculty performance assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a computer spreadsheet system utilizing Lotus software.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of the software for organizing, analyzing, and reporting faculty performance data.
  • System designed to calculate faculty merit increases based on performance metrics.

    • Main Results:

    • The developed system offers a more precise and objective method for calculating merit increases.
    • Utilizing Lotus software streamlines the organization and analysis of large datasets.
    • The computer-based approach simplifies the complex process of merit increase calculation.

    Conclusions:

    • A computer spreadsheet system can significantly improve the faculty merit increase process.
    • Adopting such technology enhances objectivity, precision, and efficiency in evaluations.
    • Institutions should consider computer-based solutions for fairer and more effective faculty compensation.