Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating clinical decision rules.

Susan E Shapiro1

  • 1University of California, San Francisco Medical Center.

Western Journal of Nursing Research
|July 16, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Nurses can use a new framework to evaluate clinical decision rules (CDRs) for practice. This ensures CDRs are valid, effective, and cost-efficient, improving patient outcomes and healthcare systems.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome after COVID-19 vaccination prior to the recognition of vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis: A self-controlled case series study in England.

Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis·2022
Same author

Nursing Policies and Protocols: Do Nurses Really Use Them?

Journal of nursing care quality·2020
Same author

Methodology for sampling women at high maternal risk in administrative data.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2019
Same author

Associations Between Hospital Maternal Service Level and Delivery Outcomes.

Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health·2019
Same author

Diagnosis and management of dysfibrinogenemia.

Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O·2018
Same author

Growing a Robust Academic Practice Partnership in an Academic Health System.

Nursing administration quarterly·2018
Same journal

The Relationship Between Cognitive Flexibility and Career Adaptability in Nursing Interns: The Mediating Role of Future Work Self-Salience.

Western journal of nursing research·2026
Same journal

Effects of Compassion Meditation on Psychological Status in Patients With Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Western journal of nursing research·2026
Same journal

Experiences of Staff in the Transition of People Living With Dementia From Home to Long-term Care Facilities Based on Person-Centred Care: A Meta-synthesis.

Western journal of nursing research·2026
Same journal

Engaging With Hospital Staff to Develop Implementation Strategies For Delivering a Patient Falls Prevention Education Program Using a World Café.

Western journal of nursing research·2026
Same journal

The Quiet Power of Keywords.

Western journal of nursing research·2026
Same journal

The Role of eHealth Literacy in Internet Gaming Disorder and Help-Seeking Among College Students.

Western journal of nursing research·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Nursing
  • Healthcare Management
  • Clinical Informatics

Background:

  • Clinical decision rules (CDRs) are essential for evidence-based practice.
  • Nurses require robust evidence to adopt CDRs confidently.
  • Evaluation criteria for CDRs must address performance, generalizability, and patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a framework for clinical nurses to evaluate CDRs.
  • To guide nurses in assessing the external validity and impact of CDRs.
  • To promote the effective and efficient implementation of CDRs in clinical settings.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a framework for CDR evaluation.
  • Focus on external validity, patient outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.
  • Application of the framework using the Braden Scale as a case study.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The framework provides a structured approach to CDR assessment.
  • The Braden Scale example demonstrates the framework's utility.
  • Evidence supports the framework's ability to evaluate CDRs for practice.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed framework empowers nurses to critically appraise CDRs.
  • Adoption of validated CDRs can enhance patient care and system efficiency.
  • This evaluation method supports informed decision-making in clinical practice.