Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does the use of a flap during abdominoperineal resection decrease pelvic wound morbidity?

Vishal Kapoor1, Jana Cole, F Frank Isik

  • 1Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-6410, USA.

The American Surgeon
|July 19, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving primary care management and referral practices for paediatric allergic rhinitis: A quality improvement study.

Australian journal of general practice·2026
Same author

Improving Clinical Efficiency Using Artificial Intelligence Scribe for Documentation (ICE-AID Study): A Retrospective-Prospective Cohort Study at a Quaternary Children's Hospital and Health Service.

Journal of paediatrics and child health·2026
Same author

BCS2.0: a capture sequencing platform for rapid differential diagnosis of bacterial infections and antimicrobial resistance.

Frontiers in microbiology·2026
Same author

Adaptation of custom capture sequencing panels to the Oxford Nanopore MinION platform.

Molecular biology reports·2026
Same author

Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Appendicitis: 2025 Edition of the World Society of Emergency Surgery Jerusalem Guidelines.

JAMA surgery·2026
Same author

Appendicitis.

Nature reviews. Disease primers·2025
Same journal

Complete Response of Merkel Cell Carcinoma to Immunotherapy and Single-Fraction Radiotherapy Following Severe COVID-19 Infection: A Case Report and Review of Immune Mechanism.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Perioperative Acute Myocardial Infarction in Non-Cardiac Operations: A National Analysis.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Outcomes of Completion Cholecystectomy: Association With Patient Comorbidity in a National Database.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Building the Conversation: Editorial Stewardship in Contemporary Surgical Publishing.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal Pain in Surgeons on Operating Days.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Splenectomy During Cytoreductive Surgery: Marker of Surgical Burden or Independent Predictor of Morbidity?

The American surgeon·2026
See all related articles

Tissue transfer (TT) during abdominoperineal resection (APR) did not significantly reduce perineal wound complications in this retrospective study. While trends suggested potential benefits for wound healing in specific patient groups, further prospective research is needed.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Oncology
  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Wound Healing Research

Background:

  • Perineal wound complications are a significant concern following abdominoperineal resection (APR).
  • Tissue transfer (TT), a type of reconstructive surgery, is hypothesized to mitigate these complications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether concurrent tissue transfer (TT) during abdominoperineal resection (APR) reduces perineal wound complications.
  • To compare wound healing outcomes in patients who underwent APR with and without TT.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 92 patients undergoing APR between 1984 and 2003.
  • Comparison of perineal wound complication rates and healing times between patients with and without concurrent TT.
  • Analysis included patient demographics, cancer characteristics, and treatment history (e.g., radiation therapy).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Patients undergoing TT had longer operative times but similar lengths of stay compared to non-TT patients.
  • No statistically significant differences were observed in overall or major wound healing complication rates between the TT and non-TT groups.
  • A trend suggested improved wound healing at 6 months for patients receiving TT, particularly those with prior radiation therapy, though not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

  • Concurrent tissue transfer (TT) during abdominoperineal resection (APR) did not significantly lower the rate of perineal wound complications in this study.
  • The potential benefit of TT for wound healing in patients with recurrent cancer and preoperative radiation therapy warrants further investigation through prospective studies.