Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Neural network dynamics.

Tim P Vogels¹, Kanaka Rajan, L F Abbott

¹Volen Center for Complex Systems and Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA. vogels@brandeis.edu

Annual Review of Neuroscience

|July 19, 2005

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Implications of hierarchical Markov models of behavior: on irreversibility, predictability, and dimensionality.

ArXiv·2026

Same author

Cortical development dynamics across autism spectrum disorder mouse models.

Nature·2026

Same author

Measuring and Controlling Solution Degeneracy across Task-Trained Recurrent Neural Networks.

Advances in neural information processing systems·2026

Same author

Deep RL Needs Deep Behavior Analysis: Exploring Implicit Planning by Model-Free Agents in Open-Ended Environments.

Advances in neural information processing systems·2026

Same author

POCO: Scalable Neural Forecasting through Population Conditioning.

Advances in neural information processing systems·2026

Same author

Gradient Descent as Loss Landscape Navigation: a Normative Framework for Deriving Learning Rules.

Advances in neural information processing systems·2026

Same journal

Body-Brain Integration: The Lower Brainstem in Sleep-Wake Regulation.

Annual review of neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Planning in the Brain: It's Not What You Think It Is.

Annual review of neuroscience·2026

Same journal

The Emerging Neurobiology of Psychedelics: Critical Periods, Metaplasticity, and Extracellular Matrix Remodeling.

Annual review of neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Rethinking Predictive Processing.

Annual review of neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Path Integration in Alzheimer's Disease: Orientation, Movement, and Theta Rhythmicity.

Annual review of neuroscience·2026

Same journal

The Cellular and Circuit Basis of Temperature Sensation in <i>Drosophila</i>.

Annual review of neuroscience·2026

See all related articles

This review explores neural network models of internally generated brain activity, including sustained responses for working memory, oscillatory patterns, and chaotic dynamics. Understanding these internal processes is key to cognitive function.

Area of Science:

Computational neuroscience
Systems neuroscience

Background:

Most neural activity is internally generated, not just stimulus-driven.
Neural network models often focus on stimulus responses, neglecting internal dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

To review network models of internally generated neural activity.
To highlight the importance of internal dynamics for cognitive function.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature on neural network models.
Focus on three key types of network dynamics: sustained responses, oscillations, and chaos.
Examination of stimulus-driven activity propagation in spontaneously active networks.

Main Results:

Models of sustained responses explain working memory.

Related Experiment Videos

Oscillatory network activity is a significant area of study.

Chaotic dynamics model complex background spiking patterns.

Spontaneously active networks influence stimulus-driven activity propagation.

Conclusions:

Internal neural network dynamics are crucial for cognitive functions.
Further exploration of these dynamics is necessary for a complete understanding of neural circuits.
Network models provide essential frameworks for studying brain activity.