Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Public consultation in ethics: an experiment in representative ethics.

Michael M Burgess1

  • 1W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics and the Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Canada.

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
|July 20, 2005
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how public consultation enhances ethical analysis in genomics governance. It emphasizes inclusive dialogue to ensure diverse moral perspectives inform policy and sustain ethical debate.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Research data use in a digital society: a deliberative public engagement.

International journal of population data science·2024
Same author

Narratives in Public Deliberation: Empowering Gene Editing Debate with Storytelling.

The Hastings Center report·2021
Same author

Deliberation on Childhood Vaccination in Canada: Public Input on Ethical Trade-Offs in Vaccination Policy.

AJOB empirical bioethics·2021
Same author

Sharing linked data sets for research: results from a deliberative public engagement event in British Columbia, Canada.

International journal of population data science·2021
Same author

Layperson Views about the Design and Evaluation of Decision Aids: A Public Deliberation.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2021
Same author

Early-Phase Clinical Trials and Reimbursement Submissions to the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review.

PharmacoEconomics·2021

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Genomics Governance
  • Public Policy

Background:

  • Genome Canada funded research to assess ethical analysis in public opinion for genomics governance.
  • Public consultation is increasingly vital for integrating societal values into biotechnology policy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of diverse ethical analysis methods for public opinion in genomics.
  • To elucidate the interplay between public consultation and ethical analysis in governing genomics and biotechnology.

Main Methods:

  • The study describes the role of public consultation in ethical analysis.
  • It examines how ethical analysis contributes to public consultation and governance.
  • Focuses on designing consultations to elicit diverse moral experiences.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchEmpirical ApproachGenetics and Reproduction

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Public consultation enriches ethical analysis by incorporating varied moral viewpoints.
  • Carefully designed consultations yield diverse and detailed accounts of moral experiences.
  • Identifying diverse public interests before issue definition prevents premature closure of ethical dialogue.

Conclusions:

  • Ethical dialogue, enhanced by social analysis, is crucial for governing genomics.
  • It addresses power dynamics and non-policy influences in genomics governance.
  • Sustaining social debate on persistent ethical issues is essential.