Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Simultaneity constancy: detecting events with touch and vision.

Vanessa Harrar1, Laurence R Harris

  • 1Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3, Canada.

Experimental Brain Research
|July 20, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differences in perceived travel distance from central versus peripheral optic flow are the same when standing and walking.

PloS one·2026
Same author

How the characteristics of a virtual environment affects the perception of travel distance through it.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Feasibility and impact of virtual reality exposure therapy on epilepsy-specific anxiety: Phase 3 of the AnxEpiVR pilot clinical trial.

Epilepsy & behavior reports·2026
Same author

Failure to replicate the Aubert-Fleischl effect.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Audio-Visual Integration in 3D Space Near the Body.

Multisensory research·2025
Same author

Can visual acceleration evoke a sensation of tilt?

Experimental brain research·2025
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Energy-dependent cortical injury thresholds in high-frequency transcortical electrical stimulation: a biophysical study in a rat model.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

The brain compensates for visual and tactile processing time differences to perceive events as simultaneous. This simultaneity constancy mechanism appears to be parallel, not unified, across different sensory combinations.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Multisensory integration combines information from different senses.
  • Visual and tactile stimuli have different neural processing times based on location.
  • Understanding these differences is crucial for event perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the consequences of visual and tactile processing time differences on multisensory perception.
  • To determine how the brain combines visual and tactile information about events on the body's surface.
  • To explore the mechanisms underlying simultaneity constancy.

Main Methods:

  • Measured reaction times to visual (light) and tactile (touch) stimuli on various body parts.
  • Assessed perceived subjective simultaneity (PSS) for different stimulus pairings.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Investigated potential parallel processing mechanisms by altering auditory-visual PSS and observing effects on visual-touch PSS.

    • Main Results:

    • Perceived subjective simultaneity (PSS) was influenced by reaction time differences.
    • Compensation for processing time differences occurred when stimuli were on different body parts (hand/foot).
    • Complete simultaneity constancy was observed for hand stimuli, but not consistently for foot stimuli.
    • Altering auditory-visual PSS did not affect visual-touch PSS, suggesting parallel mechanisms.

    Conclusions:

    • The brain employs simultaneity constancy to perceive events accurately, compensating for sensory processing delays.
    • Simultaneity constancy mechanisms appear to operate in parallel for different sensory combinations (e.g., visual-tactile vs. auditory-visual).
    • This suggests distinct neural pathways or processes for maintaining temporal coherence across different sensory modalities.