Related Experiment Videos
Multimodel ranking and inference in ground water modeling.
Eileen Poeter1, David Anderson
1International Ground Water Modeling Center, Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, CO 80401, USA. epoeter@mines.edu
Ground Water
|July 21, 2005
Summary
Considering multiple hydrogeologic models is crucial for groundwater system evaluation. Kullback-Leibler (K-L) information offers a superior method for model inference, providing realistic precision and favoring parsimony.
Area of Science:
- Hydrogeology
- Environmental Science
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- Hydrogeologic uncertainty necessitates evaluating multiple plausible models for groundwater system characterization.
- Existing model selection criteria often favor parsimony, potentially leading to underfitting and an oversimplified representation of reality.
- Multiple models typically provide acceptable fits to observational data, underscoring the need for multimodel inference.
Purpose of the Study:
- To advocate for the use of Kullback-Leibler (K-L) information as a rigorous and practical approach for multimodel inference in hydrogeology.
- To highlight the statistical underpinnings that make K-L information preferable to other model selection criteria.
- To demonstrate the application of K-L information for groundwater model evaluation through a computer-generated example.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing Kullback-Leibler (K-L) information for quantitative model comparison and selection.
- Employing a computer-generated example to illustrate the practical implementation of K-L based multimodel inference.
- Analyzing statistical foundations to contrast K-L information with traditional model selection approaches.
Main Results:
- Kullback-Leibler (K-L) information provides a computationally simple and interpretable method for model inference.
- K-L information inherently favors parsimonious models while offering a more realistic measure of predictive precision.
- The K-L approach treats models as approximations, aligning with the expectation that more data reveals greater system detail.
Conclusions:
- Multimodel inference using Kullback-Leibler (K-L) information is a statistically sound and practical approach for hydrogeologic modeling.
- K-L information offers advantages over traditional criteria by providing a more realistic assessment of uncertainty and model fit.
- The proposed method enhances the evaluation of groundwater systems by embracing model uncertainty and iterative refinement with new data.