Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Science and regulation: current impasse and future solutions.

Polly J Hoppin1, Richard Clapp

  • 1Environmental Health Initiative of the Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, School of Health and Environment, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, 600 Suffolk St., 5th floor, Lowell, MA 01854, USA. phoppin@envhealth.net

American Journal of Public Health
|July 21, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Letter to the Editor of Risk Analysis on the de Vries et al. Article (2021) on the Role of the Media in Communicating About Risks Linked to Crumb Rubber.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2022
Same author

Letter to the Editor: Cancer rates not explained by smoking: how to investigate a single county.

Environmental health : a global access science source·2021
Same author

Rethinking Environmental Carcinogenesis.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2020
Same author

Cancer rates not explained by smoking: a county-level analysis.

Environmental health : a global access science source·2020
Same author

The increasing toll of adolescent cancer incidence in the US.

PloS one·2017
Same author

Environmental and Economic Strategies for Primary Prevention of Cancer in Early Life.

Pediatrics·2016
Same journal

Erratum In: "Ogunbajo et al. Respond".

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The Role of Gender in HIV Care Engagement Among Individuals Assigned Male Sex at Birth: Medical Monitoring Project, United States, 2015-2022.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Domestic Returns to Predictable US Participation in the World Health Organization: Health Security and Cost.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The Risks of Mortality, Cardiovascular Events, and Pulmonary Complications in Cancer Patients Who Smoke Cigarettes and Switch to E-Cigarettes: South Korea, 2015‒2022.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Retailers CARE Program in Montgomery County, Ohio, Partners With Alcohol, Tobacco, and Lottery Retailers to Promote Healthier Communities.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Trends in Sexual Activity, Condom Use, and Use of Pregnancy Prevention Methods Among Female Adolescents: United States, 2007-2023.

American journal of public health·2026
See all related articles

The Daubert decision

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Public Health Policy
  • Legal Studies

Background:

  • The Supreme Court's Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. decision has implications beyond courtrooms.
  • Private interests may use Daubert-like reasoning to undermine public health and environmental regulations.
  • There is a need to assess the broader impact of judicial decisions on regulatory science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the influence of the Daubert decision on regulatory science.
  • To explore the threat of Daubert-like thinking in the regulatory arena.
  • To propose mechanisms for encouraging private sector engagement in public health and environmental protection.

Main Methods:

  • Review and reflection on four articles discussing the Daubert decision.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of arguments concerning the impact of Daubert on regulatory frameworks.
  • Exploration of corporate shifts towards prioritizing health and environmental standards.

    • Main Results:

    • The potential threat of Daubert-like reasoning in regulatory settings is greater than its impact in court.
    • Some companies are proactively integrating health and environmental priorities into their operations.
    • Existing mechanisms for encouraging corporate responsibility in science-based regulation are insufficient.

    Conclusions:

    • Daubert-like interpretations pose a significant risk to public health and environmental safeguards.
    • Encouraging corporate pledges to use science for public good can foster sustainable practices.
    • Harnessing private sector innovation is crucial for developing ecological, economical, and equitable production systems.