Related Experiment Videos
Human embryos in the original position?
1Department of Philosophy, Bowling Green State University, 339 Shatzel Hall, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA. rdisilv@bgnet.bgsu.edu
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|July 23, 2005
Summary
John Rawls' A Theory of Justice suggests human embryos deserve moral consideration. Both paternalism and equality principles imply protecting potential human life from the earliest stages.
Area of Science:
- Political Philosophy
- Bioethics
- Moral Status of Embryos
Background:
- John Rawls' A Theory of Justice is a foundational text in political philosophy.
- The moral status of human embryos is a significant ethical debate.
- Rawls' theories on justice and rights provide a framework for ethical analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze John Rawls' A Theory of Justice for insights into the moral status of human embryos.
- To explore how Rawls' concepts of paternalism and equality apply to embryonic development.
- To argue for a conservative stance on embryo's moral status based on Rawlsian principles.
Main Methods:
- Textual analysis of John Rawls' A Theory of Justice.
- Application of Rawls' principles of paternalism and equality to the case of human embryos.
- Interpretation of the 'original position' and 'veil of ignorance' in relation to embryonic stages.
Main Results:
- Rawls' discussion on paternalism implies protecting individuals from their earliest, undeveloped stages.
- Rawls' argument for equality, based on the potentiality for realizing capacity, extends rights to embryos.
- Both lines of reasoning in Rawls' work support granting basic rights to human embryos.
Conclusions:
- John Rawls' philosophical framework supports a conservative view on the moral status of human embryos.
- The principles of protecting the vulnerable and recognizing potentiality necessitate safeguarding embryos.
- Rawlsian justice, when applied to human development, advocates for the moral consideration of embryos.