Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rethinking research ethics.

Rosamond Rhodes1

  • 1Mount Sinai School of Medicine.

The American Journal of Bioethics : AJOB
|July 23, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does Public Engagement Have a Role in Biomedical Clinical Research?

Bioethics·2026
Same author

Re-Constructing Medical Ethics.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

The Reality and Morality of Organ Allocation Policy: It's Complicated.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

Results From A Novel Surgical Ethics Curriculum for General Surgery Residents.

Journal of surgical education·2025
Same author

Research ethics education needs assessment in Serbian medical researchers.

Ethics & behavior·2025
Same author

Fogarty-Funded Research Ethics Training Programs in Eastern Europe.

Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE·2025
Same journal

Defending the Ethical Permissibility of Laryngeal Transplantation.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same journal

A Framework of Institutional Obligations for Pragmatic Clinical Trials.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same journal

Should Adherence to Medical Recommendations Be a Requirement for Kidney Transplant Candidacy?

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same journal

How "America First" Abandoned Global Health: The Case for an African Model.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same journal

Carrots and Sticks: Incentives in Shaping Digital Health Products.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same journal

From Empowerment to Offloading: Task Shifting and the Redistribution of Responsibility in Digital Health.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
See all related articles

Contemporary research ethics, focusing on informed consent, may be misdirected. This paper proposes a revised ethical framework for human subject research, clarifying autonomy and challenging established dogmas.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Ethics
  • Research Ethics

Background:

  • Modern research ethics policies originated from Nazi atrocities, leading to an overemphasis on informed consent for human subject protection.
  • This historical context and initial focus may have inadvertently set research ethics on an incorrect trajectory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the foundational principles of contemporary research ethics.
  • To propose a more coherent and effective framework for the ethical conduct of human subject research.
  • To address conceptual confusions and missteps in current ethical policies.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of historical context and policy development in research ethics.
  • Clarification of different interpretations of autonomy in ethical discourse.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBelmont ReportBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchOffice for Human Research Protection

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination and critique of established ethical dogmas in human subject research.

    • Main Results:

    • Identifies conceptual missteps in the prioritization of informed consent.
    • Distinguishes various meanings of autonomy, providing clearer justifications for informed consent.
    • Challenges the primacy of informed consent, the protection of vulnerable populations, and the distinction between innovation and research.

    Conclusions:

    • Current research ethics policies, centered on informed consent, require re-evaluation.
    • A revised ethical framework is proposed to better guide the conduct of human subject research.
    • Challenging established dogmas offers a path toward more effective and ethically sound research practices.