Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How I do it: evaluating renal masses.

Gary M Israel1, Morton A Bosniak

  • 1Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. gary.israel@yale.edu

Radiology
|July 26, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of splenic infarction in cancer patients: a retrospective, single center report of 206 cases.

Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis·2021
Same author

Annular pancreas in a 24-year-old woman with persistent abdominal pain.

BMJ case reports·2019
Same author

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Endometrial Polyps: Frequency of Occurrence and Interobserver Reliability.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2018
Same author

Role of MRI in the Use of an Absorbable Hydrogel Spacer in Men Undergoing Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: What the Radiologist Needs to Know.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2017
Same author

Management of the Incidental Renal Mass on CT: A White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2017
Same author

Management of Incidental Adrenal Masses: A White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2017
Same journal

Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

Accurate diagnosis of renal masses using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is achievable. High-quality imaging, clinical history, and awareness of limitations are key for differentiating surgical, nonsurgical, or follow-up cases.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Modern computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging enable straightforward diagnosis of most renal masses.
  • Key clinical questions involve determining if a renal mass requires surgery, conservative management, or follow-up imaging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present techniques for CT and MR imaging of renal masses.
  • To summarize an approach to diagnosing renal masses.
  • To review imaging findings and highlight diagnostic limitations.

Main Methods:

  • Performance of high-quality CT and MR imaging examinations.
  • Consideration of patient clinical history.
  • Exclusion of conditions mimicking renal neoplasms.
  • Awareness of potential pitfalls and limitations of CT and MR imaging.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Accurate diagnosis of most renal masses is typically achieved with modern CT and MR imaging.
  • Evaluation relies on quality imaging, clinical context, and differential diagnosis.
  • Understanding imaging limitations is crucial for accurate assessment.

Conclusions:

  • CT and MR imaging are powerful tools for renal mass evaluation.
  • A systematic approach incorporating imaging quality, clinical information, and awareness of limitations enhances diagnostic accuracy.
  • Recognizing the limitations of CT and MR imaging is essential for optimal patient management.