Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026
12:23
Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
Published on: April 15, 2014
[Conventional techniques of visual field examination Part 2: confrontation visual field testing -- kinetic perimetry]
U Schiefer1, J Pätzold, F Dannheim
1Abteilung für Pathophysiologie des Sehens und Neuroophthalmologie, Universitäts-Augenklinik Tübingen. ulrich.schiefer@uni-tuebingen.de
Summary
This review focuses on conventional visual field testing, including kinetic perimetry, for diagnosing visual pathway lesions and monitoring disease progression. It provides essential concepts for ophthalmologists and other physicians.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Neuroscience
- Psychophysics
Context:
- Visual field testing is crucial for diagnosing visual pathway disorders.
- Conventional methods like kinetic perimetry are widely used and well-established.
- Understanding psychophysical principles aids in interpreting visual field findings.
Purpose:
- To review conventional visual field testing strategies, focusing on kinetic perimetry.
- To provide basic concepts in perimetry and psychophysics for ophthalmologists and physicians.
- To highlight the importance of visual field findings in diagnosis and disease management.
Summary:
- This paper details standardized white-on-white kinetic perimetry and preliminary confrontation visual field testing.
- It emphasizes the role of psychophysical principles in diagnosing unexplained visual loss.
- The review covers functional follow-up and therapeutic efficiency assessment.
Impact:
- Enhances diagnostic capabilities for visual pathway lesions.
- Improves understanding of perimetry and psychophysics in clinical practice.
- Supports accurate assessment of disease progression and treatment efficacy.
