Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Basic and applied decision making in cancer control.

Wendy Nelson1, Michael Stefanek, Ellen Peters

  • 1Basic and Biobehavioral Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. nelsonw@mail.nih.gov

Health Psychology : Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association
|July 28, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using Numerical Comparisons to Help Patients Make Choices.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Do radon risk maps encourage residential testing behaviour? Evidence from an experimental study in Canada.

Public health·2025
Same author

Late, solitary small bowel metastasis of anaplastic thyroid cancer: a case report.

Acta chirurgica Belgica·2025
Same author

NIH indirect cost cuts will affect the economy and employment.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Communicating Numeric Risk Information to Patients.

Journal of general internal medicine·2025
Same author

What drives parents' use of air quality indexes during wildfire smoke events: predictors of index knowledge, frequent checking, and following health guidance.

Population and environment·2025
Same journal

Peer racial representation at school, social experiences, and inflammation among Black adolescents.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same journal

Association of basal reproduction hormone status with the outcomes of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: The moderating effect of psychological factors.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same journal

Capturing wear in wear and tear: The negative-affect reactivity linked to discrimination is associated with biological age across two national samples of adults in the United States.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same journal

Personality moderates immunological and functional consequences of caregiver burden.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same journal

Daily-level associations between sleep hygiene, cannabis use, and sleep health outcomes.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same journal

Clinically effective child change in family-based behavioral treatment for pediatric obesity: An individual participant mega-analysis.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
See all related articles

Understanding cancer patient and provider decision-making is crucial for informed choices. The National Cancer Institute

Area of Science:

  • Health communication
  • Decision science
  • Cancer control

Background:

  • Decision-making is vital across all cancer care stages.
  • Limited understanding exists regarding patient-provider decision-making processes.
  • Effective decision-making impacts patient outcomes and satisfaction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish a scientific foundation for a National Cancer Institute initiative on decision-making in cancer control.
  • To enhance understanding of human decision-making processes in health contexts.
  • To support patients and providers in making more informed health choices.

Main Methods:

  • A multidisciplinary meeting was convened.
  • The meeting focused on the scientific underpinnings of decision-making in cancer care.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Expert insights were gathered to inform the initiative.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified key knowledge gaps in cancer decision-making research.
    • Highlighted the need for a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach.
    • Laid the groundwork for future research and interventions.

    Conclusions:

    • A comprehensive understanding of decision-making is essential for improving cancer care.
    • The National Cancer Institute's initiative aims to foster informed health choices.
    • Further research is needed to optimize patient and provider decision-making.