Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Affect, risk, and decision making.

Paul Slovic1, Ellen Peters, Melissa L Finucane

  • 1Decision Research, Eugene, OR 97401, USA. pslovic@darkwing.uoregon.edu

Health Psychology : Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association
|July 28, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using Numerical Comparisons to Help Patients Make Choices.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Cohort profile: design and respondent characteristics for the longitudinal Survey of Trauma, Resilience and Opportunity Among Neighbourhoods in the Gulf (STRONG) cohort.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Pressured or Voluntary? Motivations for Vaccination during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Future Health-Protective Behaviors.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same author

A Psychological and Linguistic Analysis of "The 2024 State of the Climate Report: Perilous Times on Planet Earth".

Bioscience·2026
Same author

From Stories to Action: How Framing, Perspective, and Identifiability in Personal Narratives Influence Vaccination Decisions.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same author

Do radon risk maps encourage residential testing behaviour? Evidence from an experimental study in Canada.

Public health·2025
Same journal

Peer racial representation at school, social experiences, and inflammation among Black adolescents.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same journal

Association of basal reproduction hormone status with the outcomes of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: The moderating effect of psychological factors.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same journal

Capturing wear in wear and tear: The negative-affect reactivity linked to discrimination is associated with biological age across two national samples of adults in the United States.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same journal

Personality moderates immunological and functional consequences of caregiver burden.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same journal

Daily-level associations between sleep hygiene, cannabis use, and sleep health outcomes.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same journal

Clinically effective child change in family-based behavioral treatment for pediatric obesity: An individual participant mega-analysis.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
See all related articles

People perceive risk in two ways: immediate feelings and logical analysis. The "affect heuristic" explains how emotional responses influence risk perception and decision-making, impacting health choices.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Risk Analysis

Background:

  • Human risk perception and decision-making are complex.
  • Two primary modes of risk processing exist: intuitive (feelings) and deliberative (analysis).
  • The affect heuristic, a cognitive shortcut, significantly influences these processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the dual nature of risk perception: risk as feelings versus risk as analysis.
  • To detail the development and mechanisms of the affect heuristic.
  • To discuss the implications of the affect heuristic for decision-making, particularly in health contexts like cancer prevention.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and synthesis of existing research on risk perception and heuristics.
  • Conceptual analysis of the affect heuristic and its role in decision-making.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of practical implications based on established psychological principles.

    • Main Results:

    • Risk perception is heavily influenced by immediate emotional responses, termed 'risk as feelings,' often mediated by the affect heuristic.
    • The affect heuristic provides a fast, intuitive pathway for evaluating risks, distinct from slower, analytical processing.
    • This heuristic impacts broader human decision-making and risk evaluation across various domains.

    Conclusions:

    • The affect heuristic is a fundamental mechanism shaping how individuals perceive and respond to risks.
    • Understanding the affect heuristic is crucial for effective risk communication and decision support, especially in public health.
    • Applying insights into the affect heuristic can improve strategies for cancer prevention and treatment adherence.