Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary kidney disease clinic in achieving treatment guideline targets
Siva Thanamayooran1, Caren Rose, David J Hirsch
1Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Insights
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) clinics improve metabolic and blood pressure control, but guideline targets remain unmet for many patients. Multidisciplinary care facilitates peritoneal dialysis but struggles with anemia and vascular access.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Internal Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients often present with suboptimal metabolic and hypertension control.
- Existing literature suggests CKD clinics improve patient outcomes, but data on their specific impact on these parameters is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of a multidisciplinary CKD clinic on metabolic control, blood pressure, anemia management, and renal replacement therapy access.
- To assess the achievement of guideline-recommended targets in a CKD patient cohort managed in a specialized clinic.
Main Methods:
- Historical prospective review of 340 CKD patients (estimated creatinine clearance <60 ml/min) referred to a multidisciplinary clinic between 1998-1999.
- Data collected included blood pressure, metabolic and anemia parameters, medications, access planning, and dialysis initiation.
- Follow-up data analyzed at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years.
Main Results:
- Phosphate control improved, but hyperphosphatemia persisted in 27% of visits for patients with CCr <30 ml/min.
- Despite erythropoietin, 31% of patients with CCr <15 ml/min had hemoglobin <100 g/l.
- Blood pressure improved but remained elevated (>130/85 mmHg) in 62% of follow-up visits; 75% of proteinuric patients exceeded 125/75 mmHg despite increased ACE inhibitor use.
- Twenty-four percent initiated renal replacement therapy; peritoneal dialysis was favored for late referrals.
- Vascular access for hemodialysis was suboptimal, with only half using fistulas and many relying on central catheters without prior fistula attempts.
Conclusions:
- CKD clinic attendance improved metabolic and blood pressure control and facilitated peritoneal dialysis use, even for late referrals.
- The multidisciplinary model, despite including nephrologists, nurse educators, and dietitians, failed to achieve guideline targets for metabolic control, anemia, blood pressure, and vascular access in a significant patient proportion.
Background:
We have demonstrated previously that at referral most chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have suboptimal metabolic and hypertension control. Although several studies suggest that CKD clinics improve patient outcome, in fact there are minimal published data describing the actual effect of such clinics on these parameters.
Methods:
We performed a historical prospective review of a cohort of 340 CKD patients referred to our multidsciplinary clinic in 1998 or 1999, with estimated creatinine clearance (CCr) <60 ml/min. Data regarding blood pressure (BP) control, metabolic/anaemia parameters, medications, access planning and dialysis starts were collected.
Results:
The number of patients followed was 234, 144, 100 and 70 at years 1-4 of follow-up, respectively. Twenty-five percent of the patients were diabetic, and 25% were suspected to have ischaemic nephropathy; mean age was 67+/-15 years. Although phosphate control improved from referral, below a CCr of 30 ml/min, 27% of visits showed hyperphosphataemia. Thirty-one percent of patients with CCr <15 ml/min had haemoglobin <100 g/l at follow-up despite the availability of erythropoietin. BP improved from a mean of 151/80 mmHg at referral to 137/75 mmHg in subsequent visits. At follow-up visits, 62% of BPs were still >130 mmHg systolic or 85 mmHg diastolic. For proteinuric patients (>1 g/day), 75% of follow-up visits showed BP >125/75 mmHg, despite angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use increasing from 35% at referral to 79% at follow-up. Twenty-four percent of patients started renal replacement therapy, initially haemodialysis (HD) in 57%, peritoneal dialysis (PD) in 35% and pre-emptive transplant in 8%. Thirty-eight percent of dialysis starts occurred within 6 months of referral, but PD was the modality in half of these. Only half of the HD patients started using an aterio-venous fistula, and of those using a central catheter 11 of 24 had been followed >6 months, but only four of them had attempted fistula creation.
Conclusions:
CKD clinic attendance was associated with improvements in metabolic and BP control, and was able to facilitate the use of PD even for late referrals. However, even the multidisciplinary model with nephrologists, nurse educators and dietitians was unable to achieve guideline-recommended metabolic, anaemia, BP and access targets for a significant number of patients.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Acute Kidney Injury VI: Nursing Management
