Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Visual persistence of figures defined by relative motion.

S Shioiri¹, P Cavanagh

¹Department of Image Science, Chiba University, Japan.

Vision Research

|May 1, 1992

Summary

Visual persistence of motion-defined figures, identified using random-dot kinematograms, lasts longer than luminance-defined figures. This suggests visual persistence involves cortical processing, not just retinal mechanisms.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

First- and second-order transformational apparent motion rely on common shape representations.

Vision research·2021

Same author

Visual search for feature and conjunction targets with an attention deficit.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013

Same author

Holographic and trace strength models of rehearsal effects in the item recognition task.

Memory & cognition·2011

Same author

Attentional resolution.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2011

Same author

Optokinetic technique for measuring infants' responses to color.

Applied optics·2010

Same author

The position of moving objects.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2007

Area of Science:

Visual perception
Neuroscience
Cognitive psychology

Background:

Visual persistence is the phenomenon where a visual stimulus appears to remain visible after its physical presentation has ended.
Previous research primarily focused on luminance-defined figures, leaving the persistence of motion-defined figures less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

To measure and compare the visual persistence of motion-defined figures versus luminance-defined figures.
To investigate the neural basis of visual persistence, particularly the involvement of cortical areas.
To determine if motion aftereffects influence the visual persistence of motion figures.

Main Methods:

Utilized random-dot kinematograms to create stimulus figures defined by relative motion (motion figures) and luminance differences (luminance figures).
Employed the two-frame, missing element task to measure visual persistence duration after stimulus offset.
Conducted experiments to assess the impact of motion aftereffects and stimulus contrast on persistence.

Main Results:

Motion-defined figures exhibited visual persistence of approximately 130 milliseconds, slightly longer than luminance-defined figures.
Persistence duration for motion-defined figures was independent of motion aftereffects.
Motion-defined figures showed longer visual persistence than luminance-defined figures across varying contrast levels.

Conclusions:

Visual persistence is not solely a retinal phenomenon but involves higher-level cortical processing, as motion detectors are absent in early visual pathways.
Distinct neural mechanisms likely underlie the visual persistence of motion-defined and luminance-defined figures.
The findings contribute to understanding how the brain integrates motion information for sustained visual representation.

Related Experiment Videos