Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Reliable Mechanochemistry: Protocols for Reproducible Outcomes of Neat and Liquid Assisted Ball-mill Grinding Experiments
Published on: January 23, 2018
Quantifying errors in tableting data analysis using the Ryshkewitch equation due to inaccurate true density
1Pfizer Global Research and Development, 7000 Portage Road, Portage, Michigan 49001, USA. changquan.sun@pfizer.com
Abstract:
Although inaccurate true density affects analysis of powder compaction data, such effects have not been systematically evaluated in the literature. This work is aimed at quantitatively evaluating effects of inaccurate true density on tableting data analysis using the Ryshkewitch equation, sigma = sigma0 e - bepsilon, where epsilon is tablet porosity, sigma is tensile strength, sigma(0) and b are constants that are used to characterize tableting properties of a powder. Mathematical expressions are derived to enable reliable prediction of the influence of inaccurate true density on sigma(0) and b. The validity of the expressions is suggested by modeling the effects of inaccurate true density based on a set of accurate literature tableting data and confirmed using multiple sets of tableting data of water-containing powders that exhibit inaccurate helium pycnometry densities. Percentage errors in fitted sigma(0) and b as functions of errors in true density follow the derived mathematical expressions. With increasing percentage error in true density, percentage errors increase exponentially in fitted sigma(0) and increase linearly in fitted b, while R(2) is not affected. According to the mathematical expressions, true density with <0.28% error is required to achieve 4% accuracy in fitted sigma(0) for typical pharmaceutical powders.
More Related Videos
10:22Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
09:16Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method
Published on: May 12, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Random and Systematic Errors
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...