Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Surrogacy: the evolution of opinion.

D R Bromham1

  • 1Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds.

British Journal of Hospital Medicine
|May 2, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Establishing an ethical framework for surrogate motherhood is challenging, often leading to paradoxes and infringing on individual liberties. Public opinion is complex and influenced by various factors, making intuitive assumptions unreliable for policy-making.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prospective multicentre study comparing levonorgestrel implants with a combined contraceptive pill: final results.

The British journal of family planning·1999
Same author

Long-acting hormonal contraception.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·1997
Same author

Trying to prevent abortion.

The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception·1997
Same author

Contraceptive implants.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1996
Same author

Cardiovascular disease and oral contraceptive use.

The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception·1996
Same author

Safety of modern oral contraceptives.

Lancet (London, England)·1996

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Sociology
  • Law

Background:

  • Surrogate motherhood presents complex ethical dilemmas.
  • Existing legal and ethical guidelines often result in paradoxical situations.
  • Public perception of surrogate motherhood is influenced by diverse and often inaccurate assumptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the inherent difficulties in establishing a universally accepted ethical framework for surrogate motherhood.
  • To analyze the paradoxical outcomes of current regulatory attempts.
  • To investigate the interplay of factors shaping public opinion on this issue.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of ethical theories and legal precedents.
  • Analysis of public opinion surveys and sociological data.
  • Case study examination of controversial surrogate motherhood arrangements.

Main Results:

  • Ethical frameworks for surrogate motherhood frequently conflict with individual liberties.
  • Attempts to legislate or create guidelines often lead to intractable paradoxes.
  • Public opinion is highly variable and not reliably predicted by common assumptions.

Conclusions:

  • Developing an equitable ethical framework for surrogate motherhood remains a significant challenge.
  • Policy-making requires a nuanced understanding of interacting social, ethical, and legal factors.
  • Further research is needed to reconcile competing interests and inform public discourse.
Keywords:
Empirical ApproachGenetics and Reproduction

Related Experiment Videos