Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A Bayesian approach on sample size calculation for comparing means.

Hansheng Wang1, Shein-Chung Chow, Murphy Chen

  • 1Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing, China. hansheng@gsm.pku.edu.cn

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|August 5, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Delphinidin targets voltage-dependent anion channel 1 to inhibit ferroptosis and protect against retinal photochemical damage.

Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology·2026
Same author

Genome-wide analysis of the <i>GID</i> gene family in soybean and analysis of expression under gibberellin treatment.

Frontiers in plant science·2026
Same author

Decentralized EM algorithm for Gaussian mixtures under data heterogeneity and partial labeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Multiscale multimodal graph convolutional networks for identifying essential tremor and dystonic tremor.

Neurobiology of disease·2026
Same author

The pyruvate kinase activator etavopivat (FT-4202) limits pulmonary and systemic sequelae of sepsis in a mouse LPS model.

American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology·2026
Same author

Power Calculation for Non-inferiority Test Based on Linear Combination of Two Correlated Binary Endpoints.

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2026
Same journal

Correction.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Leveraging external controls in clinical trials: estimands, estimation, assumptions.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Special issue of nonclinical statistics in regulatory applications guest editors' notes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Comparison of flexible parametric modeling and nonparametric methods to estimate restricted mean survival time: A simulation study.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Simulated treatment comparisons with jackknife pseudo values for estimating population-adjusted marginal treatment effects.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Sample sizes for randomized controlled trials utilizing Bayesian response adaptive randomization for continuous outcomes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
See all related articles

A novel Bayesian approach improves clinical trial sample size calculations by accounting for pilot study uncertainty. This method offers a more reliable sample size estimation than traditional frequentist methods.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Research
  • Biostatistics
  • Bayesian Statistics

Background:

  • Sample size calculation in clinical research often relies on pilot study estimates.
  • Traditional methods may be misleading due to unaddressed sampling error in pilot data.
  • Accurate sample size is crucial for study validity and resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a Bayesian approach for sample size calculation that incorporates uncertainty from pilot studies.
  • To provide a more robust alternative to frequentist methods that ignore sampling error.
  • To demonstrate the practical application and benefits of the proposed Bayesian method.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Bayesian framework with noninformative priors to model parameter uncertainty.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Incorporated pilot sample data and appropriate loss functions to derive Bayesian estimators.
  • Applied these Bayesian estimates within the traditional sample size calculation framework.
  • Main Results:

    • The Bayesian approach yields sample size estimates that differ from traditional frequentist calculations.
    • The proposed method explicitly accounts for sampling error inherent in pilot studies.
    • Sample size adjustments are not solely dependent on a constant inflation factor related to pilot study size.

    Conclusions:

    • The Bayesian approach offers a more statistically sound method for sample size determination in clinical research.
    • This method enhances the reliability of sample size calculations by acknowledging parameter uncertainty.
    • The Bayesian strategy provides a valuable alternative for researchers facing unknown parameters in study design.