Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Monetary lessons from litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Thomas R McLean1

  • 1Third Millennium Consultants, LLC, Shawnee, Kansas, USA.

The American Surgeon
|August 11, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy litigation outcomes show minimal financial differences between settlements and plaintiff verdicts. Surgeons sued alone should consider trial to prove innocence, avoiding settlements unless "red flags" favor the plaintiff.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Protein-only nanocapsules induce cross-presentation in dendritic cells, demonstrating potential as an antigen delivery system.

Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine·2020
Same author

Herculean efforts and standardizing valve labeling.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2019
Same author

Causation in Interventional Observational Studies.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2019
Same author

A Question of Simpson's Paradox.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2018
Same author

Seafood allergy: A comprehensive review of fish and shellfish allergens.

Molecular immunology·2018
Same author

Evolution of thyroid hormone distributor proteins.

Molecular and cellular endocrinology·2017

Area of Science:

  • Medical-Legal Studies
  • Surgical Outcomes Research
  • Litigation Analysis

Background:

  • Adverse events in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) can lead to litigation.
  • Data on the financial outcomes of LC-related malpractice suits is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the financial results of malpractice litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
  • To provide insights for surgeons regarding litigation strategy and settlement decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Review of 104 malpractice suits concerning laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
  • Analysis of case outcomes: settlements, plaintiff verdicts, and surgeon verdicts.
  • Comparison of financial awards between settlements and verdicts, with and without multiple defendants.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Out of 104 suits, 18 settled, 48 resulted in plaintiff verdicts, and 18 in surgeon verdicts.
  • Excluding multi-defendant cases, the financial difference between settlements and plaintiff verdicts was less than $20,000.
  • Plaintiff verdicts generally resulted in significantly higher financial awards than settlements when multiple defendants were involved.

Conclusions:

  • Surgeons as sole defendants in LC malpractice cases should consider proceeding to trial to seek exoneration, as settlements may not significantly differ financially from plaintiff verdicts.
  • Litigation strategy should consider factors like multiple defendants, plaintiff characteristics, injury type (e.g., bile duct injuries), attorney expertise, and venue, which can influence outcomes.