Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Novel In Vivo Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging Techniques for Assessing the Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Published on: March 24, 2023
MR imaging of the liver
Diego R Martin1, Raman Danrad, Shahid M Hussain
1Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. diego_martin@emoryhealthcare.org
Abstract:
MR imaging is establishing a role as a primary diagnostic technique, with increasing evidence showing MR imaging to have advantages over CT regarding diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for many pathologies of solid organs, bile and pancreatic ducts, bowel, peritoneum, and retroperitoneum. In addition, there are increasing concerns regarding the risks of radiation and iodinated contrast associated with CT imaging of the abdomen. The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy associated with iodinated contrast used for CT scanning is difficult to ascertain because reporting is spurious and variable in interpretation.
Insights
Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging offers superior diagnostic accuracy for abdominal conditions compared to Computed Tomography (CT). MR imaging is a safer alternative due to concerns about CT radiation and contrast risks.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Diagnostic Techniques
Background:
- Computed Tomography (CT) is widely used for abdominal imaging.
- Concerns exist regarding radiation exposure and iodinated contrast risks with CT.
- Contrast-induced nephropathy from CT contrast is a noted complication.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic advantages of MR imaging over CT for abdominal pathologies.
- To highlight the safety benefits of MR imaging compared to CT.
Main Methods:
- Review of evidence comparing MR imaging and CT for abdominal conditions.
- Assessment of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for various abdominal organs and structures.
Main Results:
- MR imaging demonstrates superior diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for pathologies of solid organs, bile and pancreatic ducts, bowel, peritoneum, and retroperitoneum.
- MR imaging avoids risks associated with CT radiation and iodinated contrast agents.
Conclusions:
- MR imaging is emerging as a primary diagnostic technique for abdominal evaluation.
- MR imaging presents a safer and more sensitive alternative to CT for numerous abdominal conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

