Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of fMRI motion correction software tools.

T R Oakes1, T Johnstone, K S Ores Walsh

  • 1Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53705, USA. troakes@wisc.edu

Neuroimage
|August 16, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development and validation of single-item experience sampling measures of wellbeing in teens.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Characterising the transcriptomic response of bovine peripheral blood mononuclear cells to a mycobacterial cell wall fraction.

Molecular immunology·2024
Same author

Rhesus infant nervous temperament predicts peri-adolescent central amygdala metabolism & behavioral inhibition measured by a machine-learning approach.

Translational psychiatry·2024
Same author

Incidental Findings from 16,400 Brain MRI Examinations of Research Volunteers.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2023
Same author

Hyperthyroid cats and their kidneys: a literature review.

Australian veterinary journal·2022
Same author

The innate immune stimulant Amplimune® is safe to administer to young feedlot cattle.

Australian veterinary journal·2022
Same journal

Segmentation of the parasagittal dura mater on multi-center 3D-FLAIR MRI.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Spatial frequency channels implement a mental ruler in spatial vision.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Exploring the Link Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Measured Brain Diffusivity During Wakefulness and Sleep Macrostructure in the Elderly.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Closed-loop adaptation of transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity with electroencephalography feedback.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Volumetric postmortem MRI of the medial temporal lobe in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders: methodological advances and implications for in vivo biomarker development.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Neural responses to equity and inequity when receiving vicarious rewards for self and charity during adolescence.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Motion correction in fMRI improves activation detection, but the choice of software package (AFNI, SPM2, etc.) does not significantly impact results. Phantom data showed AFNI and SPM2 were most accurate for motion estimation.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • Motion correction is a crucial preprocessing step in fMRI data analysis.
  • Variations in motion correction algorithms across software packages may influence results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of leading fMRI motion correction software packages.
  • To evaluate the impact of different parameter settings (default, speed, accuracy) on motion correction efficacy.

Main Methods:

  • Compared AFNI, AIR, BrainVoyager, FSL, and SPM2 using human and simulated phantom fMRI data.
  • Analyzed activation cluster size and maximum t-value using general linear models (GLM).
  • Assessed motion estimation accuracy, interpolation smoothing, and processing speed.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Phantom data indicated AFNI and SPM2 provided the most accurate motion estimation, with AFNI showing minimal smoothing and fastest processing.
  • Human data revealed performance differences between packages but no single package dramatically outperformed others.
  • Optimized parameters (speed/accuracy) offered minimal improvement over defaults for human data.
  • Motion correction consistently improved activation detection (up to 20% magnitude, 100% cluster size) regardless of software choice.

Conclusions:

  • Motion correction is a valuable fMRI preprocessing step, significantly enhancing activation detection.
  • While software packages differ in motion estimation accuracy and speed, these differences do not substantially alter overall activation results in typical human fMRI studies.
  • The choice of motion correction software has a limited impact on the overall improvement gained from this preprocessing step.