Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Implications and outcome of permanent coronary sinus lead extraction and reimplantation
Martin C Burke1, Joseph Morton, Albert C Lin
1Section of Cardiology, University of Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. mburke@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
Insights
Laser lead extraction in the coronary sinus (CS) is feasible for select cases with clear indications. However, vein occlusion after lead indwelling longer than three months can limit future reimplantation options.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Biventricular pacemakers and atrial cardioverters necessitate permanent lead placement in the coronary sinus (CS).
- Increasing complexity of cardiac anatomy and lead interactions in the CS.
- Need for effective strategies for permanent cardiac lead management and extraction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the implications and outcomes of coronary sinus (CS) lead removal.
- To assess the feasibility of using laser sheaths for CS lead extraction.
- To evaluate the impact of lead dwell time on CS vein patency and future reimplantation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 28 patients undergoing 55 permanent cardiac lead extractions in 2003.
- Subset of 10 patients underwent CS or CS branch lead extraction using excimer laser sheath or direct traction.
- CS venograms used to assess vein anatomy before and after extraction.
Main Results:
- Laser sheath entry into the CS was required in 3 of 4 laser extraction cases, with sheath sizes ranging from 12- to 14-Fr.
- No procedural complications occurred during CS lead extraction.
- Post-extraction venograms revealed complete occlusion of the CS vein and its branches in 50% of patients with leads indwelling >3 months, rendering them unusable for reimplantation.
Conclusions:
- Laser lead extraction in the CS is feasible in carefully selected patients with mandatory indications.
- Special intraoperative monitoring, echocardiographic imaging, and surgical backup are strongly recommended.
- Lead dwell time exceeding 3 months can limit future CS vein selection for reimplantation due to occlusion.
Objective:
We examined the implications and outcome of coronary sinus (CS) lead removal including the feasibility of laser use within the CS.
Background:
Cardiac anatomy and lead interactions are more complex with the advent of biventricular pacemakers and atrial cardioverters requiring permanent lead/shocking coil placement in the coronary sinus and its branches.
Methods:
Fifty-five permanent cardiac leads were extracted during 2003 in 28 consecutive patients. Our study population included a 10/55 (18%) subset (all males; age 73 +/- 6 years; EF = 0.24 +/- 0.09) that underwent CS (1/10) or vein branch (9/10) lead extraction. Leads were extracted with an excimer laser sheath (n = 4) or by direct traction (n = 6). Median times between implantation and lead removal were 9.5 months (range 5-59) in the laser group and 3 months (range 3-4) in the direct traction group. Indication for extraction was infection (n = 4), dislodgement (n = 3), diaphragm stimulation (n = 2), and elevated threshold (n = 1). The CS was divided into distal, mid, and proximal segments by venogram.
Results:
Entry of the laser sheath into the CS was necessary in three of four laser patients. The two distal CS laser cases (left lateral CS coil and anterior-lateral left ventricular (LV) lead) required both 14- and 12-Fr sheaths, separately. The proximal CS laser case (posterior-lateral LV lead) required a 12 Fr sheath. The remaining laser patient required a 12-Fr sheath to pass to the mid SVC. There were no procedural complications as a result of CS lead extraction. Reimplantation of a CS lead was attempted in 7/10 patients at a median of 4 days (range 1-300). CS venograms were available for review in patients before initial implantation (6/10) and after extraction (7/10). The postextraction venograms demonstrated complete occlusion of the vein from which the lead was extracted, and its distal branches, which were unusable in 5/10 (50%). The vein occlusions were present in patients with indwelling leads for greater than 3 months and were independent of extraction method.
Conclusions:
Laser lead extraction in the coronary sinus appears feasible in carefully selected cases with mandatory indications. However, special intraoperative monitoring and echocardiographic imaging with surgical backup ready is strongly recommended. Target vein selection may be limited for the purpose of reimplantation when leads are indwelling for greater than 3 months.
More Related Videos
13:10Direct Re-implantation of Left Coronary Artery into the Aorta in Adults with Anomalous Origin of Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery (ALCAPA)
Published on: April 24, 2017
08:42Cox-Maze IV Procedure Concomitant with Valvular Surgery In Situs Inversus Dextrocardia: A Single-Center Experience in China
Published on: February 11, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization