Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

First trimester screening: economic implications.

George A Macones1, Anthony Odibo

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. gmacones@mail.obgyn.upenn.edu

Seminars in Perinatology
|August 18, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The association of sociodemographic differences with clinical management following a diagnosis of short cervix.

Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

A model to predict red blood cell transfusion during/after cesarean delivery.

Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Maternal cytomegalovirus serology results by geographic region in a large multicenter United States study.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2026
Same author

International multi-stakeholder consensus statement on patient, carer and public involvement to enhance clinical trial integrity.

Accountability in research·2026
Same author

Activity Restriction in Pregnancy and the Risk of Early Delivery: The AWARE Study.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same author

Childhood Pulmonary Outcomes After Late Preterm Antenatal Corticosteroids.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

The society for neonatal nutrition and lifelong health: Building science and translating research to inform neonatal nutritional care.

Seminars in perinatology·2026
Same journal

Enteral nutrition to optimize health and neurodevelopmental outcomes in very preterm infants.

Seminars in perinatology·2026
Same journal

Standardizing outcome measures in preterm infant nutrition research: Use of anthropometry and body composition in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Seminars in perinatology·2026
Same journal

A dilemma of parental inclusion? Parent perspectives of NICU feeding practices and neonatal nutritional research.

Seminars in perinatology·2026
Same journal

Maternal diet and nutritional status during pregnancy and lactation: a review of implications on milk composition and lactation outcomes.

Seminars in perinatology·2026
Same journal

Initial nutrition in preterm infants: Evidence, uncertainty, and research priorities.

Seminars in perinatology·2026
See all related articles

New Down syndrome detection strategies require careful economic evaluation. Current analyses often overlook indirect and intangible costs, limiting resource allocation insights.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Economics
  • Prenatal Diagnostics
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • The United States faces soaring healthcare costs, necessitating careful resource allocation.
  • Implementing new Down syndrome detection strategies has significant economic implications.
  • Limited resources require thorough economic considerations before widespread adoption.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the economic considerations for new Down syndrome detection strategies.
  • To emphasize the limitations of current economic analyses in prenatal diagnosis.
  • To advocate for comprehensive cost-benefit assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Review of economic analyses methodologies in prenatal diagnosis.
  • Identification of direct, indirect, and intangible costs in healthcare.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of resource allocation challenges in the context of Down syndrome screening.

    • Main Results:

    • Economic implications are a critical factor in adopting new Down syndrome detection methods.
    • Existing economic analyses predominantly focus on direct medical costs.
    • Indirect and intangible costs are frequently omitted, providing an incomplete economic picture.

    Conclusions:

    • A comprehensive economic evaluation is essential before implementing new Down syndrome detection strategies.
    • Future analyses must incorporate indirect and intangible costs for accurate assessments.
    • Informed decision-making requires a holistic understanding of economic impacts.