Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sound source identification with ANR earmuffs.

S M Abel1, J E Shelly Paik

  • 1Communications Group, Human Factors Research and Engineering Section, Defence Research & Development Canada - Toronto, P.O. Box 2000, 1133 Sheppard Ave. W. Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3M 3B9. sharon.abel@drdc-rddc.gc.ca

Noise & Health
|August 18, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effects of background noise on cognitive performance during a 70 hour simulation of conditions aboard the International Space Station.

Noise & health·2004
Same author

The effect of the audallion BEAMformer noise reduction preprocessor on sound localization for cochlear implant users.

Ear and hearing·2002
Same author

The role of high-frequency hearing in age-related speech understanding deficits.

Scandinavian audiology·2000
Same author

The effect of aging on horizontal plane sound localization.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Diagnostic value of infantile stridor: a perceptual test.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology·2000
Same author

Human cytochrome P450s: selectivity and measurement in vivo.

Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems·1999
Same journal

The End of NIOSH's Hearing Loss Prevention Program: Setback or Opportunity?

Noise & health·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Conventional Floor-to-Floor Prediction Models for Train-Induced Noise and Vibration and Their Association with Residents' Depressive Symptoms.

Noise & health·2026
Same journal

Spectral Profile Analysis and Speech-in-Noise Performance in Habitual Earphone Users with Normal Hearing.

Noise & health·2026
Same journal

Annoyance and task performance during a single high-level aircraft noise and multiple lower-level aircraft noises.

Noise & health·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Different Types of Music on Pain and Anxiety during Wound Care Procedures in Patients with Venous Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Noise & health·2026
Same journal

Environmental Noise and Cardiovascular Risk: A Causal Inference Study.

Noise & health·2026
See all related articles

Hearing protective earmuffs with active noise reduction (ANR) impair sound source identification. This technology hinders directional hearing cues, increasing sound localization errors and potentially safety risks.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Occupational safety and health

Background:

  • Hearing protection devices are crucial in noisy environments.
  • Active noise reduction (ANR) technology aims to enhance noise suppression.
  • The impact of ANR on sound localization, a critical safety cue, requires investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effect of ANR earmuffs on sound source identification.
  • To determine if ANR interferes with directional hearing cues.
  • To assess potential safety implications in hazardous environments.

Main Methods:

  • Normal-hearing subjects (two age groups) participated in sound localization tests.
  • A circular array of eight loudspeakers presented auditory stimuli (0.5 kHz, 4 kHz, broadband noise).
  • Localization accuracy was measured with and without ANR earmuffs, assessing interaural time/level differences and spectral cues.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Wearing ANR earmuffs significantly decreased sound source discrimination by 10% (0.5 kHz), 35% (4 kHz), and 40% (broadband).
  • Earmuffs interfered with the encoding of binaural (interaural level differences) and spectral cues.
  • Increased right/left confusions were noted for low-frequency stimuli with ANR.

Conclusions:

  • ANR earmuffs negatively impact sound localization abilities.
  • The use of ANR earmuffs may compromise safety in situations requiring hazard perception.
  • ANR technology does not appear to mitigate, but rather exacerbates, sound localization deficits.