Parental decision-making after ultrasound diagnosis of a serious foetal abnormality

Hilmar H Bijma1, Hajo I J Wildschut, Agnes van der Heide

  • 1Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. h.hbijma@freeler.nl

Insights

Parental decisions after fetal abnormality diagnosis are influenced by emotions, not just rational risk assessment. Understanding these cognitive and emotional factors is crucial for supporting parents through this difficult process.

Area of Science:

  • Fetal Medicine
  • Psychology
  • Decision-Making Theory

Background:

  • Parental decision-making after ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abnormalities is complex.
  • Existing literature on parental decision-making in genetic counseling and general decision-making theories provides relevant insights.
  • Limited data specifically addresses parental choices following ultrasound detection of serious fetal anomalies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To offer a comprehensive overview of theories guiding parental decision-making post-ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abnormalities.
  • To inform clinicians in fetal medicine about relevant decision-making frameworks.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review encompassing parental decision-making in genetic counseling and general decision-making theories.
  • Synthesis of findings to apply to the specific context of fetal abnormality diagnosis.

Main Results:

  • Parents often perceive risk in a binary manner (affected vs. unaffected), with less emphasis on probabilistic gradations.
  • Focus shifts towards the potential impact on future family life rather than statistical risk.
  • Emotional mechanisms, influenced by framing and stress, play a significant and potentially beneficial role, complementing rational processes.

Conclusions:

  • Cognitive processes influenced by emotions are vital and beneficial in parental decision-making after fetal abnormality diagnosis.
  • Assessment of parental decision-making should consider emotional outcomes alongside rationality.
  • Clinicians should acknowledge the interplay of cognitive and emotional factors in supporting parental choices.
Abstract