Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Neural latencies do not explain the auditory and audio-visual flash-lag effect.

Roberto Arrighi1, David Alais, David Burr

  • 1Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.

Vision Research
|August 24, 2005
PubMed
Summary

The flash-lag effect (FLE) occurs cross-modally between vision and audition. Neural latencies do not explain the FLE; instead, neural integration times are more critical for perception.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is number a primary perceptual attribute?

i-Perception·2026
Same author

Color induction in anomalous color vision.

Vision research·2026
Same author

Mask contrast and size do not alter suppression depth in the tracking continuous flash suppression paradigm.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Breakthrough thresholds in continuous flash suppression are tuned to mask temporal frequency but suppression depth is constant.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

A minimal physiological model of perceptual suppression and breakthrough in visual rivalry.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Adaptation acts directly on the sensory representation of numerosity.

Scientific reports·2026

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Auditory Perception
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • The flash-lag effect (FLE) describes the perception of a briefly flashed stimulus lagging behind a moving object.
  • Recent research indicates the FLE extends to auditory and cross-modal (vision-audition) domains.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate the acoustic and cross-modal FLE using a random motion technique.
  • Determine if neural latencies generally explain the FLE.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a random motion technique to assess cross-modal FLE (visual motion, auditory probes).
  • Measured visual and auditory latencies for stimulus appearance and motion using integration, temporal alignment, and reaction time techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A significant cross-modal FLE was observed for visual motion stimuli with auditory probes.
  • Static auditory stimuli were perceived faster than static visual stimuli.
  • Moving auditory stimuli were perceived slower than moving visual stimuli.
  • Measured latencies were contrary to what neural latencies would predict for the FLE.

Conclusions:

  • Neural latencies do not generally account for the flash-lag effect.
  • Neural integration times appear to be a more significant factor in explaining the FLE.