Related Experiment Videos
Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients with lower versus higher risk: a LIFE substudy
Stanley S Franklin1, Kristian Wachtell, Vasilios Papademetriou
1Heart Disease Prevention Program, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. ssfranklinmd@earthlink.net
Insights
Losartan demonstrated superiority over atenolol in reducing stroke, new-onset diabetes, and atrial fibrillation in both lower-risk and higher-risk patient groups. These benefits were observed independently of significant blood pressure reduction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction (LIFE) trial compared losartan and atenolol in hypertensive patients.
- A substudy aimed to evaluate treatment efficacy in distinct patient risk groups.
- Understanding differential drug effects based on patient risk stratification is crucial for personalized medicine.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the hypothesis that losartan is superior to atenolol in reducing cardiovascular events in lower-risk (LRG) versus higher-risk (HRG) patients.
- To assess treatment effects independently of blood pressure reduction.
- To analyze outcomes in predefined lower-risk and higher-risk patient cohorts.
Main Methods:
- Post hoc analysis of the LIFE trial data.
- Patients were categorized into LRG (no prior cardiovascular disease, no diabetes, no isolated systolic hypertension, lowest LVH quartiles) and HRG.
- Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for various endpoints.
Main Results:
- In the LRG, losartan reduced stroke (HR 0.72), new-onset diabetes (HR 0.74), and new-onset atrial fibrillation (HR 0.69) compared to atenolol.
- In the HRG, losartan reduced composite endpoints (HR 0.82), cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.77), stroke (HR 0.75), new-onset diabetes (HR 0.76), and new-onset atrial fibrillation (HR 0.71).
- Losartan showed a slightly greater systolic blood pressure reduction in the LRG (-1.8 mm Hg) and HRG (-0.7 mm Hg) versus atenolol.
Conclusions:
- Losartan, compared to atenolol, effectively reduces the risk of stroke, new-onset diabetes, and new-onset atrial fibrillation in both lower-risk and higher-risk hypertensive patients.
- The observed benefits of losartan extend beyond blood pressure reduction.
- Treatment choice may be influenced by patient risk stratification for optimal cardiovascular event prevention.
Abstract:
We hypothesized that losartan was superior to atenolol in reducing cardiovascular events in a lower-risk group (LRG) versus a higher-risk group (HRG) of patients in a Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction (LIFE) substudy, independently of blood pressure (BP) reduction. In a post hoc analysis, we designated 4282 patients as LRG on the basis of: (1) no previous cardiovascular disease (coronary, cerebral, peripheral vascular disease); (2) no diabetes; (3) no isolated systolic hypertension; and (4) inclusion of the lowest 3 quartiles of electrocardiographically documented left ventricular hypertrophy. The HRG consisted of 4911 remaining patients who did not qualify for the LRG. In the LRG, losartan was superior to atenolol in reducing stroke: hazard ratio (HR), 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.98); new-onset diabetes (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.93]; and new-onset atrial fibrillation: HR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.92), all P<0.05 but not composite end points or cardiovascular mortality (both P=NS). In the HRG, losartan was superior to atenolol in reducing composite end points: HR, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.94), P<0.01; cardiovascular mortality: HR, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.95), P<0.05; stroke: HR, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.92), P<0.01; new-onset diabetes: HR, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.96), P<0.05; and new-onset atrial fibrillation: HR, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58 to 88), P<0.05. Test for interaction of treatment with LRG versus HRG was not significant for composite end point, stroke, or atrial fibrillation, but was for cardiovascular mortality (P=0.018). Achieved systolic BP reduction favored losartan over atenolol by -1.8 mm Hg in LRG (P=NS) and -0.7 mm Hg (P=0.001) in HRG, but no significant differences occurred in diastolic or mean BP in either group. In conclusion, losartan compared with atenolol reduces the risk of stroke, new-onset diabetes, and new-onset atrial fibrillation in the LRG and the HRG.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Hypertension I: Introduction