Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
Published on: February 10, 2016
Effect of variability in level on forward masking and on increment detection
Walt Jesteadt1, Kim S Schairer, Donna L Neff
1Center for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, 555 N 30th St, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA. Jesteadt@boystown.org
Forward masking threshold is largely unaffected by masker level variability. Subject performance in auditory tasks like forward masking and increment detection does not rely on energy detection but may use template matching.
Area of Science:
- Auditory perception
- Psychoacoustics
- Signal detection theory
Background:
- Forward masking is a phenomenon where a masker presented before a signal affects signal detection.
- Previous research suggests masker level can influence forward masking, but its precise role is debated.
- Understanding decision strategies in auditory tasks is crucial for explaining perception.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of masker level variability on forward masking thresholds.
- To determine if subjects employ an energy detection strategy in forward masking and increment detection tasks.
- To explore alternative decision models, such as template matching.
Main Methods:
- Four experiments were conducted using a two-interval forced-choice (2IFC) adaptive procedure.
- Varying masker levels across intervals and analyzing trial-by-trial data.
- Measuring performance using signal-to-noise ratio and d' in some experiments.
- Replicating findings with varied masker frequencies and in an increment-detection task.
Main Results:
- Varying masker level from interval to interval had minimal impact on forward masking thresholds.
- Subject performance was better when the masker in the signal interval was lower, independent of the nonsignal interval masker.
- Results were consistent across different masker variabilities and frequencies.
- Similar patterns were observed in an increment-detection task.
Conclusions:
- Decision processes in forward masking and increment detection are similar.
- These auditory tasks are unlikely to be based on a simple energy detection strategy.
- Template matching provides a plausible alternative explanation for the observed results.
More Related Videos
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
06:46Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
Published on: March 18, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Masking and Demasking Agents
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on the metal...