Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differences between searching among objects and searching among holes.

Johan Hulleman1, Glyn W Humphreys

  • 1University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England. jhulleman@hull.ac.uk

Perception & Psychophysics
|August 27, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The lack of efficacy of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in the five-day training of a difficult visual search task.

Brain stimulation·2026
Same author

The (mis)use of the gate metaphor for attention.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Errors in visual search: How can we reduce them?

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

In simple but challenging search tasks, most errors are stochastic.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2024
Same author

Errors in visual search: Are they stochastic or deterministic?

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2024
Same author

On the usefulness of graph-theoretic properties in the study of perceived numerosity.

Behavior research methods·2022

Searching for a "C" among "O"s was easier with objects than holes. This difference was mainly due to grouping with the background, suggesting hole shapes are indirectly perceived.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Experimental psychology

Background:

  • Visual search tasks often involve distinguishing target items from distractors.
  • Understanding how features like shape, motion, and contrast influence search efficiency is crucial.
  • The perception of 'holes' versus 'objects' presents unique challenges in visual processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differences in visual search performance between target items defined as holes versus objects.
  • To determine the factors, such as grouping and surface medium, that influence this performance difference.
  • To test the hypothesis that the shape of a hole is perceived indirectly.

Main Methods:

  • Six experiments were conducted using a visual search paradigm.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants searched for a target character ('C') among distractor characters ('O').
  • Search items (targets and distractors) were defined by motion, contrast, or both, and presented as either holes or objects.

    • Main Results:

    • Visual search was significantly easier when targets were presented as objects compared to holes.
    • The primary reason for this difference was attributed to grouping effects with the background.
    • Search performance for both holes and objects was influenced by the surface medium used.

    Conclusions:

    • The shape of a hole is likely perceived indirectly, unlike objects.
    • Grouping with the background plays a critical role in differentiating search performance between holes and objects.
    • Surface medium is an important factor affecting visual search for both hole and object stimuli.