Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random Error01:04

Random Error

849
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
849
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.8K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.8K
Trial and Error and Algorithm01:12

Trial and Error and Algorithm

105
A problem-solving strategy is a plan of action used to find a solution. Different strategies have distinct action plans. Trial and error involves trying different solutions until one works. For instance, to fix a broken printer, you might check ink levels, ensure the paper tray isn't jammed, and verify the printer's connection to your laptop. This method can be time-consuming but is commonly used. Thomas Edison, for example, used trial and error to find a suitable filament for the light...
105
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.6K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

658
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
658
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

491
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
491

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Tetrastigma Hemsleyanum Polysaccharide Suppresses Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by Disrupting the Hippo-YAP/TEAD4-PDIA4 Axis and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Adaptation.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

A common signal-strength factor limits awareness and precise knowledge of multiple moving objects across the adult lifespan.

Cognition·2026
Same author

The (mis)use of the gate metaphor for attention.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Attention and visual search: No crisis here.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Behavioral Research Will Help Us Understand When AI Will Help Radiologists.

Radiology·2025
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

41.8K

In simple but challenging search tasks, most errors are stochastic.

Jeremy M Wolfe1,2, Johan Hulleman3, Ava Mitra4

  • 1Brigham and Women's Hospital, 900 Commonwealth Ave, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. jwolfe@bwh.harvard.edu.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|August 19, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Most visual search errors, or look but fail to see (LBFTS) errors, are stochastic, not deterministic. This suggests that repeated viewing or double reading could reduce these common errors.

Keywords:
ErrorStochastic and deterministic errorsVisual attentionVisual search

More Related Videos

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

20.8K
T-maze Forced Alternation and Left-right Discrimination Tasks for Assessing Working and Reference Memory in Mice
17:45

T-maze Forced Alternation and Left-right Discrimination Tasks for Assessing Working and Reference Memory in Mice

Published on: February 26, 2012

39.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

41.8K
Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

20.8K
T-maze Forced Alternation and Left-right Discrimination Tasks for Assessing Working and Reference Memory in Mice
17:45

T-maze Forced Alternation and Left-right Discrimination Tasks for Assessing Working and Reference Memory in Mice

Published on: February 26, 2012

39.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Look but fail to see (LBFTS) errors occur when observers miss visible targets in visual search tasks.
  • Understanding the nature of these errors (deterministic vs. stochastic) is crucial for improving search efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the probability of joint errors in visual search tasks when targets are presented twice.
  • To determine whether LBFTS errors are deterministic or stochastic under varying search difficulty.

Main Methods:

  • Two visual search experiments using a 'T among Ls' task with degraded stimuli.
  • Experiment 1 varied target-distractor density (clumped vs. isolated).
  • Experiment 2 increased stimulus similarity between targets and distractors.

Main Results:

  • Errors increased when targets were clumped but remained predominantly stochastic.
  • Increased stimulus similarity also resulted in predominantly stochastic errors.
  • Joint error probabilities were consistent with stochastic error processes.

Conclusions:

  • Visual search errors in this task are primarily stochastic, meaning they are not consistent across repeated presentations.
  • The stochastic nature of errors suggests that strategies like double reading could effectively reduce overall error rates in various contexts.