Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Universal norms and conflicting values.

Michael J Selgelid1

  • 1Sesquicentenary Lecturer in Bioethics, Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine; and Unit for History and Philosophy of Science, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia, selgelid@med.usyd.edu.au.

Developing World Bioethics
|September 1, 2005
PubMed
Summary

UNESCO's bioethics declaration presents conflicting principles without guidance. This study argues for revising the declaration to better balance competing values like autonomy and harm minimization in healthcare.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantifying the impact of individual and collective compliance with infection control measures for ethical public health policy.

Science advances·2023
Same author

Ethics review of COVID-19 human challenge studies: A joint HRA/WHO workshop.

Vaccine·2022
Same author

Reconciling Regulation with Scientific Autonomy in Dual-Use Research.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2022
Same author

Key criteria for the ethical acceptability of COVID-19 human challenge studies: Report of a WHO Working Group.

Vaccine·2020
Same author

Invisible epidemics: ethics and asymptomatic infection.

Monash bioethics review·2020
Same author

Should practice and policy be revised to allow for risk-proportional payment to human challenge study participants?

Journal of medical ethics·2020

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Human Rights Law
  • Healthcare Ethics

Background:

  • UNESCO's Universal Draft Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights outlines key ethical values.
  • The declaration's principles are presented in absolute terms, leading to inherent conflicts.
  • Existing guidance inadequately addresses the resolution of conflicting ethical principles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the conflicts between ethical principles in bioethics.
  • To evaluate the adequacy of UNESCO's Draft Declaration in managing value conflicts.
  • To propose revisions for better conflict resolution in bioethical guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of UNESCO's Universal Draft Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.
  • Examination of case studies involving conflicts between autonomy/liberty and benefit/harm principles.
Keywords:
Bioethics and Professional EthicsUniversal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights

Related Experiment Videos

  • Argumentative reasoning on the relative importance of principles in healthcare contexts.

    • Main Results:

    • UNESCO's declaration presents principles as absolute, creating conflicts.
    • The document lacks sufficient mechanisms for balancing competing ethical values.
    • Conflicts between autonomy and benefit maximization/harm minimization are inadequately addressed.

    Conclusions:

    • The absolute nature of principles in the UNESCO declaration hinders practical application.
    • Liberty and autonomy may hold less weight than beneficence and non-maleficence in healthcare.
    • Revisions to UNESCO's principles are necessary for effective conflict resolution in bioethics.