Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
Published on: August 4, 2023
Reconciling Regulation with Scientific Autonomy in Dual-Use Research
Nicholas G Evans1, Michael J Selgelid2, Robert Mark Simpson3
1University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract:
In debates over the regulation of communication related to dual-use research, the risks that such communication creates must be weighed against against the value of scientific autonomy. The censorship of such communication seems justifiable in certain cases, given the potentially catastrophic applications of some dual-use research. This conclusion however, gives rise to another kind of danger: that regulators will use overly simplistic cost-benefit analysis to rationalize excessive regulation of scientific research. In response to this, we show how institutional design principles and normative frameworks from free speech theory can be used to help extend the argument for regulating dangerous dual-use research beyond overly simplistic cost-benefit reasoning, but without reverting to an implausibly absolutist view of scientific autonomy.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Ethics in Research
Drug Regulation
Global Regulatory Systems
Regulation of the Unfolded Protein Response
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

