Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact01:03

Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact

272
Drug control governance involves the oversight and regulation of pharmaceuticals to ensure their safety and efficacy while preventing illegal drug use and trafficking. Regulatory bodies, including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Union's European Medicines Agency (EMA), play a central role in this process. These agencies evaluate the safety and efficacy of drugs before they can be marketed. They fund clinical trials and assess the benefits and risks associated with...
272
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

24.7K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.7K
Drug Regulation01:25

Drug Regulation

2.0K
Drug regulation encompasses the management of drug usage by evaluating its safety and efficacy through assessments conducted by regulatory authorities. Regrettably, the history of drug regulation is marred by several catastrophic events. One such incident is the Elixir Sulfanilamide tragedy, in which the toxic compound diethyl glycol was included in a sweet-tasting medication, leading to numerous fatalities. This event prompted the enactment of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in 1938. Under...
2.0K
Global Regulatory Systems01:28

Global Regulatory Systems

106
Global regulatory systems in bacteria enable rapid and coordinated responses to environmental changes by integrating sensory inputs with gene expression, ensuring efficient adaptation to fluctuating conditions. Key global regulatory mechanisms include regulons, two-component systems, sigma factors, and secondary messengers.Regulons and Global RegulatorsA regulon is a collection of genes and operons controlled by a common global regulator. These regulators enable bacteria to prioritize resource...
106
Regulation of the Unfolded Protein Response01:31

Regulation of the Unfolded Protein Response

2.6K
Inositol-requiring kinase one or IRE1 is the most conserved eukaryotic unfolded protein response (UPR) receptor. It is a type I transmembrane protein kinase receptor with a distinctive site-specific RNase activity. As the binding mechanics of the misfolded proteins with the N-terminal domain of IRE-1 are unclear, three binding models — direct, indirect, and allosteric -- are proposed for receptor activation. Nevertheless, it is known that once a misfolded protein associates with IRE1, it...
2.6K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

190
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
190

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Navigating open data sharing and privacy in the age of clinical AI research: from reidentification to pseudo-reidentification.

EClinicalMedicine·2026
Same author

Enhancing Soldiers for Future Warfare: Good Science; Bad Ethics?

Science and engineering ethics·2025
Same author

Horizon Scan of Emerging Issues at the Intersection of National Security, Artificial Intelligence, and Human Performance Enhancement.

Science and engineering ethics·2025
Same author

Rate of Errors During Routine Biological Manipulations.

Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association·2025
Same author

How do we justify research into enhanced warfighters?

Journal of law and the biosciences·2024
Same author

Gain-of-function research and model organisms in biology.

Journal of medical ethics·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.3K

Reconciling Regulation with Scientific Autonomy in Dual-Use Research.

Nicholas G Evans1, Michael J Selgelid2, Robert Mark Simpson3

  • 1University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|February 9, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Regulating dual-use research communication requires balancing risks against scientific autonomy. This study proposes using institutional design and free speech theory to avoid overly simplistic cost-benefit analyses in regulation.

Keywords:
dual-use researchfree speechpublic healthscientific autonomy

More Related Videos

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure
05:34

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure

Published on: December 13, 2024

780
Using SCOPE to Identify Potential Regulatory Motifs in Coregulated Genes
07:55

Using SCOPE to Identify Potential Regulatory Motifs in Coregulated Genes

Published on: May 31, 2011

10.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.3K
Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure
05:34

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure

Published on: December 13, 2024

780
Using SCOPE to Identify Potential Regulatory Motifs in Coregulated Genes
07:55

Using SCOPE to Identify Potential Regulatory Motifs in Coregulated Genes

Published on: May 31, 2011

10.5K

Area of Science:

  • Science policy
  • Bioethics
  • Communication studies

Background:

  • Debates surrounding the regulation of dual-use research communication highlight a tension between potential risks and scientific autonomy.
  • The potential for catastrophic applications of dual-use research necessitates careful consideration of communication controls.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore frameworks for regulating dual-use research communication that avoid overly simplistic cost-benefit analyses.
  • To extend the argument for regulating dangerous dual-use research without compromising scientific autonomy.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of institutional design principles.
  • Application of normative frameworks from free speech theory.
  • Examination of regulatory approaches to scientific communication.

Main Results:

  • Cost-benefit analyses for regulating dual-use research can be overly simplistic and lead to excessive regulation.
  • Institutional design and free speech theory offer robust alternatives to simplistic cost-benefit reasoning.
  • A nuanced approach can balance the need for regulation with the preservation of scientific autonomy.

Conclusions:

  • Regulation of dual-use research communication is complex, requiring more than simple cost-benefit calculations.
  • Integrating institutional design and free speech principles provides a more sophisticated approach to managing risks.
  • Striking an appropriate balance is crucial to prevent both misuse of research and undue restriction of scientific inquiry.