Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
Published on: March 1, 2022
How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology
Yoonhee Jang1, Thomas O Nelson
1Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. yjang@psyc.umd.edu
Abstract:
The authors used state-trace methodology to investigate whether a single dimension (e.g., strength) is sufficient to account for recall and judgments of learning (JOLs) or whether multiple dimensions (e.g., intrinsic and extrinsic factors) are needed. The authors separately manipulated the independent variables of intrinsic and extrinsic cues, determining their state traces for recall and JOLs. In contrast to the supposition that intrinsic cues have similar effects on both recall and JOLs whereas extrinsic cues affect JOLs less strongly than recall (i.e., 2 dimensions underlying recall and JOLs), the authors found repeated support for the sufficiency of a single dimension for both recall and JOLs (not only immediate JOLs but also delayed JOLs) across a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic cues.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Storage
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Understanding Memory
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...

