Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Microfluidics in Assessing Platelet Function
Published on: November 8, 2024
Insights from studies of blood substitutes in trauma
Ernest E Moore1, Jeffrey L Johnson, Aaron M Cheng
1Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center and University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80204, USA. Ernest.moore@dhha.org
Most authorities believe that the greatest need for blood substitutes is in patients with unanticipated acute blood loss, and trauma is the most likely scenario. The blood substitutes reaching advanced clinical trials today are red blood cell (RBC) substitutes, derived from hemoglobin. The hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers (HBOCs) tested currently in FDA Phase III clinical trials are polymerized hemoglobin solutions. The standard approach to restoring oxygen delivery in hemorrhagic shock has been crystalloid administration to expand intravascular volume, followed by stored RBCs for critical anemia. However, allogenic RBCs may have adverse immunoinflammatory effects that increase the risk of postinjury multiple organ failure (MOF). Phase II clinical trials, as well as in vitro and in vivo work, suggest that resuscitation with a HBOC--in lieu of stored RBCs--attenuates the systemic inflammatory response invoked in the pathogenesis of MOF. Specifically, an HBOC has been shown to obviate stored RBC provoked neutrophil priming, endothelial activation, and systemic release of interleukins 6, 8, and 10. Based on this background and work by others, we have initiated a multicenter prehospital trial in which severely injured patients with major blood loss (systemic blood pressure <90 mmHg) are randomized to initial field resuscitation with crystalloid versus HBOC. During the hospital phase, the control group is further resuscitated with stored RBCs, whereas the study group receives HBOC (up to 6 units) in the first 12 h. The primary study endpoint is 30-day mortality, and secondary endpoints include reduction in allogenic RBCs, hemoglobin levels <5 g/dL, uncrossmatched RBCs, and MOF. The potential efficacy of HBOCs extends beyond the temporary replacement for stored RBCs. Hemoglobin solutions might ultimately prove superior in delivering oxygen to ischemic or injured tissue. The current generation of HBOCs can be lifesaving for acute blood loss today, but the next generation might be biochemically tailored for specific clinical indications.
Most authorities believe that the greatest need for blood substitutes is in patients with unanticipated acute blood loss, and trauma is the most likely scenario. The blood substitutes reaching advanced clinical trials today are red blood cell (RBC) substitutes, derived from hemoglobin. The hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers (HBOCs) tested currently in FDA Phase III clinical trials are polymerized hemoglobin solutions. The standard approach to restoring oxygen delivery in hemorrhagic shock has been crystalloid administration to expand intravascular volume, followed by stored RBCs for critical anemia. However, allogenic RBCs may have adverse immunoinflammatory effects that increase the risk of postinjury multiple organ failure (MOF). Phase II clinical trials, as well as in vitro and in vivo work, suggest that resuscitation with a HBOC--in lieu of stored RBCs--attenuates the systemic inflammatory response invoked in the pathogenesis of MOF. Specifically, an HBOC has been shown to obviate stored RBC provoked neutrophil priming, endothelial activation, and systemic release of interleukins 6, 8, and 10. Based on this background and work by others, we have initiated a multicenter prehospital trial in which severely injured patients with major blood loss (systemic blood pressure <90 mmHg) are randomized to initial field resuscitation with crystalloid versus HBOC. During the hospital phase, the control group is further resuscitated with stored RBCs, whereas the study group receives HBOC (up to 6 units) in the first 12 h. The primary study endpoint is 30-day mortality, and secondary endpoints include reduction in allogenic RBCs, hemoglobin levels <5 g/dL, uncrossmatched RBCs, and MOF. The potential efficacy of HBOCs extends beyond the temporary replacement for stored RBCs. Hemoglobin solutions might ultimately prove superior in delivering oxygen to ischemic or injured tissue. The current generation of HBOCs can be lifesaving for acute blood loss today, but the next generation might be biochemically tailored for specific clinical indications.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Transfusion and Agglutination
History
The history of blood transfusion dates back to the 17th century, when early attempts were made in animals. In 1818 James Blundell, a British doctor, performed the first successful human blood transfusion. Later in 1900, Karl...
Blood Transfusion
Blood Transfusion Overview
A blood transfusion is a medical procedure used to replace blood lost due to injury, surgery, or to treat conditions such as anemia or cancer. During a transfusion, donor blood is...
Blood Studies I: ABG and VBG
Arterial Blood Gas (ABG)
Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) studies are crucial for assessing the lungs' ability to supply oxygen and remove carbon dioxide, reflecting the patient's ventilation status. They also help understand the kidneys' capacity to reabsorb or...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Introduction to Hemostasis
The three phases of hemostasis involve many clotting factors present in plasma and several substances released by platelets and injured tissue cells. It is a fast, localized, and...
Hemorrhagic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology

