Related Experiment Videos
Pressure-regulated volume control ventilation vs synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation for very
Carl T D'Angio1, Patricia R Chess, Stephen J Kovacs
1Strong Children's Research Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. carl_dangio@urmc.rochester.edu
Insights
Pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) did not improve survival or extubation rates in very low-birth-weight infants compared to synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV). Both ventilation modes showed similar outcomes for infants requiring mechanical ventilation.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatric Critical Care
- Respiratory Support
Background:
- Mechanical ventilation is crucial for very low-birth-weight infants.
- Optimizing ventilator settings is essential to improve outcomes and reduce complications.
- Assist/control modes like PRVC are alternatives to conventional modes like SIMV.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) in very low-birth-weight infants.
- To determine if PRVC increases the proportion of infants alive and extubated at 14 days of age.
- To assess secondary outcomes including duration of ventilation and need for supplemental oxygen.
Main Methods:
- Randomized controlled trial involving ventilated infants with birth weights between 500 and 1249 g.
- Infants were assigned to either SIMV or PRVC ventilation modes shortly after birth.
- Ventilator mode assignment continued until extubation, death, or failure criteria were met.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was observed in the proportion of infants alive and extubated at 14 days between PRVC and SIMV groups (37% vs 41%).
- Secondary outcomes, including mechanical ventilation duration in survivors and survival without supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age, were also similar.
- A higher rate of ventilator mode failure was noted in the SIMV group (33%) compared to the PRVC group (20%).
Conclusions:
- Pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) ventilation initiated at birth did not improve time to extubation in mechanically ventilated infants weighing 500 to 1249 g.
- The study found no significant advantage of PRVC over SIMV for key neonatal respiratory support outcomes.
- While PRVC showed a lower failure rate, this did not translate to improved overall clinical outcomes at 14 days.
Objective:
To test the hypothesis that pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC), an assist/control mode of ventilation, would increase the proportion of very low-birth-weight infants who were alive and extubated at 14 days of age as compared with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV).
Study Design:
Ventilated infants with birth weight of 500 to 1249 g were randomized at less than 6 hours of age either to pressure-limited SIMV or to PRVC on the Servo 300 ventilator (Siemens Electromedical Group, Danvers, Mass). Infants received their assigned mode of ventilation until extubation, death, or meeting predetermined failure criteria.
Results:
Mean +/- SD birth weights were similar in the SIMV (888 +/- 199 g, n = 108) and PRVC (884 +/- 203 g, n = 104) groups. No differences were detected between SIMV and PRVC groups in the proportion of infants alive and extubated at 14 days (41% vs 37%, respectively), length of mechanical ventilation in survivors (median, 24 days vs 33 days, respectively), or the proportion of infants alive without a supplemental oxygen requirement at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (57% vs 63%, respectively). More infants receiving SIMV (33%) failed their assigned ventilator mode than did infants receiving PRVC (20%). Including failure as an adverse outcome did not alter the overall outcome (39% of infants in the SIMV group vs 35% of infants in the PRVC group were alive, extubated, and had not failed at 14 days).
Conclusion:
In mechanically ventilated infants with birth weights of 500 to 1249 g, using PRVC ventilation from birth did not alter time to extubation.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Physiological Control of Respiration
Breathing, a seemingly passive process, is regulated by the respiratory center in the brainstem. This center coordinates the involuntary control of respirations, which means it occurs without conscious effort, ensuring a smooth and uninterrupted pattern.
Regulation of Ventilation
The body maintains ventilation by monitoring levels of carbon dioxide (CO2), oxygen (O2), and hydrogen ion concentration (pH) in the arterial blood. Among these factors, the level of CO2 plays a crucial...
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation: