Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Guidelines for Elective Pediatric Fiberoptic Intubation
Published on: January 17, 2011
Prospective assessment of guidelines for determining appropriate depth of endotracheal tube placement in children
Lorri M Phipps1, Neal J Thomas, Raymond K Gilmore
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nursing, Penn State Children's Hospital, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Insights
The common 3x endotracheal tube (ETT) size formula for pediatric depth placement is unreliable, leading to malposition in 15-25% of cases. Using Broselow tape recommendations significantly improves ETT positioning accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Airway Management
- Medical Device Efficacy
Background:
- Accurate endotracheal tube (ETT) depth is crucial for effective ventilation and preventing complications in pediatric patients.
- Current methods for determining ETT depth, such as the 3x internal diameter (ID) rule, have shown variable reliability.
- Malpositioned ETTs can lead to significant morbidity and mortality in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability of the 3x ETT size formula for oral ETT placement depth in pediatric patients.
- To compare the accuracy of the 3x ETT size formula with Broselow tape and Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) guidelines for ETT depth determination.
- To identify a more reliable method for ensuring correct ETT placement in the PICU.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, observational study conducted in a university-affiliated pediatric intensive care unit.
- Data collected included demographics, ETT size, and measured depth from the lip for orally intubated pediatric patients (<=12 years).
- Correct ETT placement was confirmed by chest radiograph, defined as ETT tip below the thoracic inlet and >0.5 cm above the carina.
Main Results:
- Out of 226 ETTs, 77% were correctly positioned using standard practices.
- Applying the 3x ETT size formula resulted in 75% accurate placement.
- Using 3x PALS-based ETT size (81%) and 3x Broselow-suggested ETT size (85%) showed improved accuracy, with Broselow tape guidance leading to significantly better ETT positioning (p = .009).
Conclusions:
- The conventional 3x ETT size formula for determining pediatric ETT depth is associated with a 15-25% malposition rate.
- Utilizing Broselow tape-recommended ETT sizes enhances the reliability of depth determination compared to the 3x ETT size formula.
- Development of a more dependable method for ETT depth placement is essential to minimize malpositioning in pediatric patients.
Objective:
To determine whether multiplying the internal diameter of the endotracheal tube (ETT) by 3 (3x ETT size) is a reliable method for determining correct depth of oral ETT placement in the pediatric population.
Design:
Prospective, observational.
Setting:
University-affiliated, 12-bed pediatric intensive care unit.
Patients:
Orally intubated pediatric intensive care unit patients of < or =12 yrs of age.
Interventions:
Demographics, ETT size, and depth of ETT placement measured from the lip were obtained. Correct placement, defined as the tip of the ETT below the thoracic inlet and > or =0.5 cm above the carina, was determined by chest radiograph.
Measurements And Main Results:
Suggested ETT size based on the Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) age-based formula and the Broselow tape-length-based guidelines were determined. A total of 174 of 226 ETTs (77%) were correctly positioned. If practitioners utilized the 3x ETT size for the actual tubes chosen, 170 of 226 (75%) would have been accurately placed. More accurate were the 3x PALS-based ETT size (81%) and 3x Broselow-suggested ETT size (85%). The use of the Broselow ETTs to determine the depth would have led to a significantly improved ETT position (p = .009) compared with the actual ETT.
Conclusion:
The commonly used formula of 3x tube size for ETT depth in children results in 15-25% malpositioned tubes. Practitioners can improve the reliability of this formula by utilizing the recommended ETT size as suggested by the Broselow tape. A more reliable method is necessary to avoid ETT malposition.
Related Concept Videos
Endotracheal Intubation I: Procedure
The ET tube comprises various components, including a standard adaptor to attach a bag-valve-mask (BVM) or ventilator, a cuff, a pilot balloon, and radiopaque markings along its length to measure the insertion distance. The tube sizes...
Endotracheal Intubation II: Nursing Management
1. Nursing Care of Patients Before Intubation
Before the endotracheal intubation procedure, nurses play an essential role in ensuring the process goes smoothly. The nurses must be familiar with intubation...
Endotracheal Tube Extubation
Procedure
Extubation removes the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient on mechanical ventilation. It requires a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals.
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...
Tracheostomy: Procedure and Tubes
Tracheostomy tubes can be made of semiflexible plastic (polyurethane or silicone), rigid plastic, or metal, and they come in...
Tracheostomy Suctioning I: Pre-Procedural Steps
Equipment Required
First, gather all necessary equipment: a sterile suction catheter, a sterile disposable container, sterile gloves, a towel or...
